|
Included in those breakdowns was a
table with a four-year sales tax revenue comparison, which did not
include the special use tax. He said that he thought removing the
special use tax and comparing the sales taxes with past years might
make this year's figures more meaningful. You can see the
comparisons by clicking on these links:
Municipal sales tax figures are
currently at 1 percent. These figures do not include the 0.5 percent
sales tax that can be used only for infrastructure.
Plotner said he thinks the increased
receipts may be attributed to all the new
businesses that have come to town in the last year, such as Dollar
Tree, Goody's, Ace Hardware and others. We can't know for sure if
they are the source of that increase unless they choose to tell us,
the way that Coy's Car Corner did recently, Plotner said.
Plotner said he has had some inquiry
about the non-home-rule sales tax. It is at $245,000-plus right now.
Of that, $32,000 is planned to transfer out for the downtown
overlay.
Another factor is the yield bonds,
which has $632,700-plus available. A total of $130,000 is scheduled
to transfer out of that for the downtown overlay. In both cases, the
transfers will be made if needed.
Between those two, without the transfer
funds, we have $715,000 available for road work, Plotner said.
There's $500,000 in the budget to transfer for road rehab. So if you
want to do road work, there's money available, he said.
In addition, there is now $136,000
available from the telecommunications tax that has not been
designated anywhere. "You've got a pretty good bundle of money to do
some road work," he said. "So, I suggest you start planning and
getting some done."
Mayor Beth Davis thanked Plotner for
his report and said, "It is sounds like maybe we're turning a
corner."
"It's certainly better than last year,"
Plotner said.
[to top of second column in
this article]
 |

The council invited residents of Elm
Street to a public hearing that was held on Sept 7. Elm Street is
the first street project planned following a delay in projects. Dave
Armbrust, chairman of streets and alleys, had hoped to get clear-cut
opinions from the residents about their preferences for the street.
He didn't get that.
A crowd did show up, but they were
evenly divided in how they would like to see their street
refurbished. There's one garage that will be 1 foot from the new
street line because it was built on city right of way.
Some residents were in favor of little
change to the street, preferring not to disturb their yards. They'd
be happy with grinding the old pavement, chip and oil, and
retrenching sewer lines, keeping the street much like it stands now.
Others liked straightening and
improving the street with curbs and gutters for a more polished
appearance.
Alderman Benny Huskins commented that
one of the problems with the road is that the center is mounded by
repeated buildups. Huskins recommended taking it all down and adding
curbs and gutters and asphalt.
City engineer Mark Mathon said that it
is currently planned for chip and oil but that asphalt can be
factored in.
Alderman Buzz Busby concurred with
Huskins, saying that when he was on the council before, "You either
did a street project or you didn't do it." He is opposed to
installing rollover curbs, as can be seen in Mayfair subdivision.
Busby said, "I would say, go ahead with the project with high-backed
curbs."
One suggestion was made at the hearing
to do curb and gutter just for the first block off Fifth Street,
giving it a nicer look for the commercial property that's there.
"We have the money put aside," Alderman
Glenn Shelton said. "We ought to do the whole thing."
On Sept. 20
the council made the decision to go the full route in improving Elm
Street by adding full high-back curbs and gutters. The project is
slated to start this spring.
[Jan
Youngquist] |
|
SALES TAX COMPARISONS 2001-2004
| |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Received |
|
January |
$151,686 |
$137,756 |
$130,787 |
$154,258 |
April |
| February |
$152,103 |
$145,432 |
$132,576 |
$159,109 |
May |
| March |
$155,064 |
$148,187 |
$160,281 |
$163,646 |
June |
| April |
$156,270 |
$174,283 |
$155,279 |
$161,070 |
July |
| May |
$155,043 |
$164,856 |
$171,847 |
$167,655 |
August |
| June |
$163,414 |
$169,784 |
$159,638 |
|
September |
| July |
$147,414 |
$157,657 |
$155,015 |
|
October |
| August |
$171,531 |
$153,297 |
$170,167 |
|
November |
| September |
$158,886 |
$175,224 |
$158,398 |
|
December |
| October |
$156,388 |
$159,484 |
$150,398 |
|
January |
| November |
$156,211 |
$151,668 |
$162,659 |
|
February |
| December |
$182,512 |
$181,980 |
$182,367 |
|
March |
|
TOTAL |
$1,906,522 |
$1,915,608 |
$1,889,412 |
|
|
JANUARY THRU MAY RECEIPTS
| |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 / June |
2004 / June |
| |
$770,166 |
$766,514 |
$750,770 / $ 910,408 |
$805,738 / $970,244
$54,968 / $59,336
7.30% / +6.57% |
|