Tuesday, Aug. 2

\

Tax stumbles Sysco financial plan

Send a link to a friend

[AUG. 2, 2005]  Officials are still gathering facts to find the best resolution to a financing problem with the Robert Sysco Food Service Inc. project. At Monday night's council meeting, city attorney Bill Bates explained the issue that became apparent this past week.

The city offered tax abatements and is covering costs associated with infrastructure to the site. The county provided the purchase of the land supplied.

Bates began by saying that according to plan the city was to borrow $300,000 and the county would borrow $900,000 in the form of debt certificates. A lawyer who specializes in this area, Kurt Froehlich of Champaign, has been handling the debt certificates for both entities.

According to plan $850,000 of the $1.2 million was to be available for use upfront. It will take $820,000 to $850,000 for the land purchases, which are expected to be completed next week.

However, it appears that the design of the agreement with Sysco causes the money borrowed to be taxable income for the banks and thereby reduces the amount that the city and county will receive from the bond certificates. It will reduce the $850,000 to $740,000.

The multi-government agreement the city and county made with Sysco includes "claw backs" provisions stipulating that construction will be completed by a specific time and that Sysco will meet hiring quotas over a period of time. It seems it is the provisions terminology that takes it into a taxable income bracket.

Froehlich had not seen the contract until the problem cropped up this past week. Bates said that Froehlich asked him, "Why didn't you tell me you were doing that?"

[to top of second column in this article]

And he said he responded to Froehlich, "Why weren't you asking [me those questions] if that made a difference?"

Now the city and county will either have to figure how to come up with $110,000 or how to make changes in the contract that will take it out of the taxable income bracket, Bates explained. The added expense could either be financed or supplied by some other fund, but Bates said that a lot of expenses associated with the project will be coming up. At this time he doesn't think taking it out of the current budget would be wise.

Neither is taking the provisions out of the contract desirable, as it would negate the security the city and county have in the project.

He has been in contact with Froehlich, Logan County State's Attorney Tim Huyett and Logan County coordinator Dewey Colter to consider the options. He would also like to consult with city finance chair Verl Prather, who was not present

The issue was left on the table to allow for additional communications and information and then to consider how best to proceed.

[Jan Youngquist]

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor