Wednesday, Jan. 11

\

City ordinance pushes local couple's hot button          Send a link to a friend

[JAN. 11, 2006]  City officials addressed a hot-button issue that a local couple brought to their attention at their committee-as-a-whole workshop on Tuesday evening.

A resident wished to address the council on a city policy that penalizes citizens. Karen Miller, who lives on Lincoln's Park Place, was there with her husband, Barry, to contest the late fee they received on their sewer bill. "It's not a matter of money. It's a matter of principle," Miller said.

She added that she works as an accountant in her work and is very organized in paying their bills at home, "I always pay our bills on time." This could happen to anybody, she said.

"I never received an original bill," Miller said. She said that when she received the late notice she called the city clerk's office and both of the ladies she spoke with said that it doesn't matter; she'd still need to pay the late fee. They also told her that they assume that if a bill doesn't come back after they are sent out, that everyone received their bill.

Miller said that she had already paid the bill and the late fee but wanted the late fee dismissed.

She said, "We are just simply asking that the city review their policy and procedures on sending out those bills and the assumption that everyone was getting one."

Mayor Beth Davis, the city clerk and the city attorney all explained the billing and mailing process and reasons for the policy.

The city sends out sewer bills due on the first of the month every four months. The past-service bill is due on the 20th every fourth month. If payment is not received, the city sends out a reminder card with a late penalty added, due by the 15th of the following month. If the bill is paid after the extended due date, then there is a $25 fee added as well.

Residential sewer fees

The bill amount is the same each time, $16.43 per month, per unit for four months of service, a total of $65.72 per four-month billing cycle.

  • $65.72 -- due on the 20th every four months*

  • $6.50 -- 10 percent late fee if not paid by the 15th of the following month

  • $25 fee -- added if not paid after the 15th of the month after the original bill

  • $97.29 -- total due after the 15th of the month after the original bill was due

The combined late fees constitute an addition of 33 percent in late charges being added to the bill.

*The city is divided up and not all properties are on the same billing cycle, but each property keeps the same four-month billing cycle year after year.

Miller said, "It is harsh to tack 10 percent on anything."

[to top of second column]

Several aldermen commented.

Buzz Busby said, "Mrs. Miller, I'm not calling you a liar. We have a lot of people come up here and say, 'Well, I didn't receive a bill.'" The bill comes due every four months, he said. "If we open that can of worms for you, how many other people would come up here and say the same thing?"

Miller responded that she understood, but "We try to be good citizens."

She said, "We've been here six years and already had two to three roundabouts with the city, and that's pretty sad."

Busby said the city clerk, Melanie Riggs, checked the Millers' records, and they have paid their bills every time on time. "I applaud you for that; a lot of people don't," he said.

Barry Miller asked why they would charge a 10 percent surcharge on 14-day-late bill. "That's a pretty high rate of interest," he said. "It doesn't take a mathematician to figure out that's pretty darn good gouging. I don't know if that's all that legal."

"I guarantee it is," city attorney Bill Bates said.

"But, is it ethical?" Mr. Miller asked.

It's been in place since 1980, Bates said. That's why we have city council, he added.

Aldermen Marty Neitzel and Wanda Lee Rohlfs empathized with Miller, but agreed that the city needs to stick to policy or it opens the door to everyone to do the same. Neitzel said she has had the same happen to her and she just paid the late fee. Rohlfs said she sends out a lot of mail and often hears later that it didn't arrive.

Alderman Daron Whitaker said he understood also from personal experience. He's had several bills a couple of months late that he has had to pay because of homeowners buying on contract from him and had not paid the bills.

"It is an ordinance. I pay them. I never ask for anything in return," he said.

He agreed with Busby that it's like paying for your lights, it's like paying for your water; you know it's coming.

Mrs. Miller said, "I'm an accountant for the attorney general's office. They have advised me that I can file a complaint with the consumer division against the city of Lincoln."

[Jan Youngquist]


< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor