New
Mississippi River bridge plan
New four-lane
bridge more affordable, does not require tolls
Send a link to a friend
[JUNE 29, 2006]
SPRINGFIELD -- Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich, Illinois
Department of Transportation Secretary Tim Martin, state Rep. Jay
Hoffman and several other Metro East legislators formally unveiled
plans Wednesday for a new, more affordable alternative to reduce
traffic congestion over the Mississippi River. The governor proposed
building a four-lane bridge alongside the existing Martin Luther
King Bridge. The new bridge, and other associated work, is expected
to cost between $410 million and $450 million. The new plan is a
more affordable alternative to building an eight-lane bridge across
the Mississippi -- which is expected to cost $910 million.
|
Illinois earmarked $300 million for the Mississippi River bridge
project, and the federal transportation bill includes $239 million.
Missouri officials have expressed interest in a public-private
partnership to build the bridge, but such a partnership would result
in tolls. If a project does not move forward by the end of the year,
the region is in jeopardy of losing the $239 million in federal
funds.
"We need to build more lanes across the Mississippi River to make
it easier for Illinois residents to get to work every day, and we
can and should do it without charging tolls," Blagojevich said. "It
just isn't right to ask the people of Illinois to pay $2 or $3 every
time they cross the river -- especially when we have other options.
That's why I directed the Illinois Department of Transportation to
explore realistic and affordable alternatives adding traffic
capacity over the Mississippi. Building
a new four-lane bridge parallel to the Martin Luther King Bridge can
provide the congestion-relief drivers need, and we can use existing
federal and state funds to build the bridge without charging tolls.
In the coming weeks and months, I hope we can continue to work with
the state of Missouri to make a non-toll bridge a reality so we can
help drivers on both sides of the river and continue regional
economic growth."
"The bottom line is we need to do something to ensure that the
people in this region don't have to continue to suffer the headaches
and frustration of bottlenecks and traffic," said Hoffman,
D-Collinsville, chairman of the Illinois House Transportation
Committee. "This is a quality-of-life issue for citizens in the
Metro East. We owe it to them to act, and if we don't act soon, we
jeopardize the federal funding."
"As I have said many times before, I am opposed to a toll on the
new bridge," said U.S. Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Illinois. "Given
Missouri's refusal to contribute any funds to this project, I have
worked with Governor Blagojevich, state Representative Jay Hoffman
and other Illinois officials to provide a reasonable alternative.
The Martin Luther King Coupler is the best alternative. It is
affordable, it can be completed in a reasonable time frame, and it
can be fully paid for without tolls."
The alternative to the proposed eight-lane, cable-stayed "New
Mississippi River Bridge" and associated roadways is building an "MLK
Bridge Coupler." This concept uses the existing bridge along with a
new parallel structure as a means to improve river-crossing capacity
with available funding. Preliminary analyses indicate that the
proposed Martin Luther King Bridge Coupler could convert the
existing structure to an eastbound bridge providing three 12-foot
lanes and carrying Interstate 70 traffic east -- versus the eight
lanes on the existing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Bridge -- while the
new structure could be a westbound bridge with four 12-foot lanes.
[to top of second column]
|
Additional benefits include providing additional interstate river
crossing in a core area, redistributing regional traffic, reducing
traffic on other core area river bridges, and improving visibility
for and access to the Edward Jones Dome and the Pinnacle Casino in
St. Louis.
Early recommendations for roadway work associated with the bridge
improvements include direct ramps to I-70 in St. Louis and to
existing I-55-70 in East St. Louis. The preliminary range of cost is
from $410 million to $450 million. It is anticipated that this
project could be completed by 2013.
A new Mississippi River crossing is desperately needed to address
dwindling cross-river capacity in the St. Louis and Metro East area.
In the 1960s, there were 22 lanes connecting the two sides; today
there are only 16. New capacity is needed to allow for economic
growth to continue, to reduce congestion and to improve safety.
The effort to build a new crossing was launched in 1992 when
Illinois and Missouri began preliminary design and an effort to
pinpoint a location for a new Mississippi River crossing. This
resulted in the proposed construction of an eight-lane crossing that
would cost $1.6 billion. To date, Illinois has spent $80 million for
preliminary engineering and land acquisition for the project.
In 2005, the two states announced that due to the escalating
costs of the crossing, they would begin a process of re-evaluating
and scaling back the design in order to come up with a project that
could be built in the near future. This re-evaluation process
included a series of public hearings on both sides of the river and
led to a new design that would cost $910 million.
However, the two states have not been able to agree on how the
project would be funded. Blagojevich and Illinois leaders have
insisted that the project should be built using state and federal
funds. The governor believes that a toll would have a
disproportionate impact on Illinoisans, since far more people travel
from the Metro East area to jobs on the Missouri side of the river
than from Missouri to Illinois.
In order to ease cross-river congestion in the short-term,
Blagojevich has secured $45 million to refurbish and reopen the now
shuttered McKinley Bridge. This will provide an additional lane in
each direction when the project is complete in the fall of 2007.
[News release from the governor's
office] |