CHAMPAIGN -- Aging adults may joke
about memory lapses and "early Alzheimer's." They may worry when
they can't understand a drug plan or lose track of the characters in
a novel.
But they have more control over their "cognitive vitality" than they
may realize, says Elizabeth Stine-Morrow, a professor of
educational psychology
at the University of Illinois, who has spent 20 years studying
learning throughout the lifespan.
Aging adults have choices in the way they allocate effort in
everyday mental tasks like reading, Stine-Morrow said. They can
compensate for subtle age-related changes rather than either giving
in to them or giving up completely on the activity, she said. They
also have choices in the way they stay mentally engaged and embrace
challenges throughout their lifetimes and into older age.
It's all part of what she has playfully named the "Dumbledore
hypothesis of cognitive aging," based on a line from the headmaster
Dumbledore in the third Harry Potter novel: "It is our choices ...
that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Certain "fluid abilities," or "mental mechanics," do tend to decline
with age, Stine-Morrow said, but it matters how we respond. "Minor
glitches in the cognitive system can loom larger than they perhaps
need to because we've got these preconceived ideas about what
happens with aging," she said.
She will discuss her "Dumbledore hypothesis" on Aug. 19 at the
American Psychological Association conference in San Francisco, in a
presidential address for the Adult Development and Aging division. A
paper on the subject has been accepted for publication in the
journal Current Directions in Psychological Science.
In her reading research, Stine-Morrow, also a professor in Illinois'
Beckman Institute for Advanced
Science and Technology, has paid particular attention to changes
we make – or fail to make – in the way we process and regulate our
reading as we age.
More recently, she has initiated a program called Senior Odyssey,
designed to engage older adults in team-based creative
problem-solving and other brain-teasing challenges. After a pilot
study, she is now at the start of a five-year, $2.8 million grant
from the National Institute on Aging to develop the program and
study its effectiveness.
Much of her reading research has involved measuring small
split-second differences in the way people move through text, and in
how and where they pause, noting how those differences affect what
they gain or remember from the text.
She has found that older adults who remember more of what they've
read tend to read differently from either younger readers or older
readers who remember less. They had learned, consciously or
unconsciously, that "in order to maintain the same level of
comprehension and memory for text as you get older, you have to do
it differently," she said.