Tuesday, Jan. 16

Logan County bed and breakfast and hunting lodge guests will not be taxed by county          Send a link to a friend

[JAN. 16, 2007]  Logan County has decided that bed and breakfast and hunting lodge guests will not be taxed by the county for their stay.

Local tourism efforts are mostly supported by hotel-motel taxes. When Geoff Ladd, the director of the Abraham Lincoln Tourism Bureau of Logan County, made his monthly presentation at the Logan County finance committee meeting last month, he said that he'd been asked by a new bed and breakfast owner if they need to collect tax for the county on guest stays.

There has been a lot of discussion on this issue in the tourism industry and at the state government level as the number of bed and breakfasts and hunting lodges has increased in recent years. These businesses commonly charge a package fee that includes meals and sometimes activities, rather than a separated bill with a room fee.

Finance chairman Chuck Ruben said that he's heard of lodges avoiding the accommodation fee by saying, "We're selling a hunt and we let them stay here for free."

Ruben asked Ladd to see what the law had to say on the matter.

Ladd returned with information for the committee this month. He said he looked into the county's ordinances, and "Section 3 leaves things pretty open-ended for taxable entities."

He said that Illinois had passed a law that went into effect a year ago, on Jan. 1, 2006. He had a copy of the law and a letter of interpretation. The state is charging taxes on these entities, but it is left up to the individual business how they would like to assess the bill. They can charge a percentage of the entire proceeds or separate the bill for taxable and nontaxable amounts.

[to top of second column]

The state then leaves it up to each county if they would charge a tax as well.

In discussing the matter, the committee recognized that Logan County actually has few of these businesses. Ruben did a rough estimate on the annual return that might be expected from the county's one hunting lodge. "At top end, we might expect $100 a year," he said. He didn't think that the amount this tax would bring in would be worth aggravating the current business owners, nor the amount of paperwork it would take for the county to handle it.

Ladd said that he was just trying to get an answer for the businesses that were asking. His concern was just if there was already an ordinance that the businesses are supposed to be in compliance with.

Ladd wanted to make sure that the local businesses know that, while they will not need to collect a county tax, they do still need to comply and collect a tax for the state. He observed from the letter that there are serious penalties for businesses that do not comply with the state law. Ruben recommended that the county send forms and a copy of the state law and the letter to the local businesses, so they don't get in trouble with the state.

[Jan Youngquist]

             

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor