|
 The three-member WTO compliance panel upheld its findings from an interim report released in July, said Roberto Azevedo, the Brazilian Foreign Minister's trade chief. "It wasn't changed," he told The Associated Press shortly after the verdict was released confidentially to American and Brazilian officials in Geneva. "The language in the previous preliminary report was maintained."
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative in Washington confirmed the loss. Washington can still appeal the ruling.
"The panel found that the changes made by the United States were insufficient to bring the challenged measures
-- certain support payments under the 2002 Farm Bill and export credit guarantees
-- into conformity with U.S. WTO obligations," it said in an e-mailed statement Monday. "We are very disappointed with these results."
The United States has argued that it sufficiently overhauled its cotton program when it scrapped two export credit guarantee programs and last year repealed the so-called Step-2 cotton-marketing program that made payments to exporters and domestic mill users as compensation for buying higher-priced American cotton.
But Brazil said Washington's continued support for American cotton producers ensured artificially high production and export levels, hurting Brazilian and African producers.
The Brazilian government claims the U.S. retained its place as the world's second-largest cotton grower by paying out $12.5 billion in government subsidies to American farmers between August 1999 and July 2003. China is the largest exporter of cotton, while Brazil is fifth.
The South American country has reserved the right to impose annual sanctions of up to $4 billion on the United States, but would probably seek less in retaliatory measures because the U.S. has removed some of the offending subsidies.
If a likely appeal also goes against U.S. cotton programs, Washington can challenge the level of retaliation the WTO authorizes.
[to top of second column] |
 Brazil has said it would target U.S. goods, as well as trademarks, patents and commercial services, under provisions in the global commerce body's intellectual property and services agreements.
The announcement that Brazil was bringing the case back before WTO arbitrators was made shortly after the July 2006 collapse of global trade talks, which aim to add billions of dollars to the world economy and help poorer countries develop their economies through new trade flows.
Brazil was one of several countries that blamed the United States for the impasse as differences over barriers to farm trade and manufacturing proved unbridgeable. The two countries have repeatedly clashed since as the talks have failed to make progress.
Critics of the subsidies say they drive down prices, making it impossible for small farms to compete in international markets, and more difficult for poorer countries to develop their economies by selling their agricultural produce abroad.
[Associated Press; by Bradley S.
Klapper]
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
 |
