|
But it was the political clout of euro-zone nations making key decisions on how they would respond to the financial crisis in October that rankled Denmark and Sweden. Both complained they were shut out of emergency talks hosted by French President Nicolas Sarkozy. "I would have wished that Denmark also was there," said Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who favors bringing his country into the euro. "That is a loss of political influence." Britain's size -- it is the second-largest economy in the EU -- meant it had no such worries. It was the only non-euro nation at the summit. The prime minister is no euro-enthusiast -- like most British voters. Poll after poll consistently show that a referendum on membership would be rejected. But some advocates think it's time for Britain to rethink its stance
-- as the pound sinks against the euro. Will Hutton, a director of the Work Foundation, wrote in the Observer newspaper recently that Britain would gain a new international importance by giving up the pound. "Britain would become a member of a reserve currency zone at a competitive level, offering us a key role in the emergent debate about the governance of globalization and the international financial system. We would remain prosperous and we would matter," he wrote. But many Britons are firmly attached to the pound. "When a nation agrees to shelve its currency, its identity is sure to follow. We are not Europe. We are this island. Our borders do not necessitate a single European currency," said chef Oliver Moesley, 57, from London.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor