Wednesday, January 23, 2008
sponsored by Illini Bank & Jake's Furniture

City Aldermen Back Economic Development Partnership

Support Stays

Send a link to a friend

[January 23, 2008]  Last week's 20-minute discussion of the city's financial support to the Lincoln & Logan County Development Partnership was followed by another 20-minute discussion this week. Lincoln aldermen were unwavering overall in their interest to continue supporting the entity.

The question was just how much to give for the remainder of this fiscal year. The partnership has been without a director since the end of October.

Alderman Buzz Busby stated last week that the partnership has an excellent candidate to replace its former director, but that they need $12,000 more to bring him in. He suggested that the city continue with their support and add $5,000.

Tuesday night, finance chairman Verl Prather made a motion that the city not only finish out the budgeted $25,000, but also give the partnership another $5,000 in this fiscal year.

He explained that the city would not need to come up with the $5,000; it is already in the budget in a line item for another economic development expense. The $5,000 is budgeted as the city's contribution toward developing a new Lincoln and Logan County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. The amount would just need to be moved. The development of a new CEDS has been put on hold.

CEDS is a companion tool to be used in conjunction with a Comprehensive Plan in steering community planning, attracting development and acquiring financing.

Some of the discussion questioned how the development partnership has used the funds that would have been paid to the past director: Was the same amount paid to the person filling in for the director's position as would have been paid to the former director? It was stated that person was paid $30 per hour but was only part time. No one knew how the total pay amounts compared.

Aldermen were reluctant to contribute $5,000 with no one in that position yet. They also couldn't see increasing the amount this close to the end of a fiscal year, giving the full $5,000 now and again for the next fiscal year, come May 1.

Alderman Jonie Tibbs said that she could not support giving them an added $5,000 right now. "I think we need to look at our new fiscal year first," she said. "Right now we need extra money for the police department, fire department, EMC (management of the sewers and wastewater treatment plant), the streets department. We're more or less letting our people down, where we need to be looking at that first, at this point in time."

She added that she may be favorable to the increase in the new budget once those figures are seen.

[to top of second column]

After much discussion a tie vote was broken by Mayor Beth Davis-Kavelman to not provide the added $5,000 for this fiscal year.

The mayor said that she would like the city to re-evaluate and see how it goes. "I have no problem with what we're doing with economic development," she said. "But we have a street truck that is falling apart; we have other things falling apart. Like Alderman Tibbs said, we do have some other priorities and things that need to be taken care of."

She said that the development partnership has said since they began in 2001 that they would be doing some of their own fundraising, moving toward becoming self-sufficient, and it hasn't happened.

The city pays the partnership quarterly and is entering the last quarter, with the fiscal year ending April 30. Further discussion and vote led to unanimous backing that the city would continue to pay the full remainder of the $25,000 budgeted amount for this fiscal year.

The aldermen expressed confidence in the teamwork that is offered through the development partnership and would continue support in the next fiscal year budget. The majority indicated they would support adding the suggested $5,000 to the next fiscal year, which begins May 1.

The budget process for the new fiscal year typically begins in late March.

Verl Prather -- This is a good faith commitment. They've done a lot of good things. All in all, you work better together. Not one entity, one government, is going to do this by theirself.

[By JAN YOUNGQUIST]

Previous related article:

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor