Monday, March 17, 2008
sponsored by Maple Ridge

American Company Rejected in $100 Billion Pentagon Bid

Governor Joins Four Other State Governors in Sending Letter in Support of Boeing's Appeal to GAO

Send a link to a friend

[March 17, 2008]  CHICAGO -- Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich joined governors of four other states in sending a letter to congressional leaders on Friday urging them to conduct a thorough and careful review of the Department of Defense's contract process in light of the recent decision to award an Air Force contract valued at as much as $100 billion to Northrop Grumman Corp. and foreign partner European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. over Chicago-based Boeing Co.

"As a company headquartered in Illinois, Boeing has been a leader in the aerospace industry since the early part of the 20th century. Contracts such as this one are vital to our state's economy and to Illinois workers. I urge Congress to hold the Pentagon accountable for the flawed decision-making process, and ask that they work to appeal it," said Blagojevich.

In the letter, the governors of Illinois, Connecticut, Washington, Wisconsin and Kansas offered to work with congressional leadership and the Bush administration to ensure that the tanker selection process is transparent and fair so that the contract award goes to the American company that best supports the U.S. military as well as the workers and taxpayers who are the foundation of our national security.

In their letter, the governors point out that serious concerns have been raised about the Department of Defense contract process, its assumptions and analyses, and the final decision-making that led to the initial tanker contract award. A first look suggests that the Pentagon's contract award and subsequent reports ignore that Boeing and the EADS/Northrop team were assigned identical ratings across all five evaluation factors: (1) mission capability, (2) risk, (3) past performance, (4) cost and (5) integrated fleet aerial refueling assessment. The governors assert that an objective review of the data as measured against the Air Force's request for proposals shows that Boeing had the better offering in terms of the most probable life cycle costs, lower risk and better capability.

Boeing is the world's leading aerospace company and the largest manufacturer of commercial jetliners and military aircraft combined. Headquartered in Chicago, Boeing employs more than 150,000 people across the United States and in 70 countries.

Under Blagojevich's leadership, Illinois is experiencing a strong economic climate, even as the nation is experiencing an economic slowdown. Since January 2004, Illinois has added 185,300 jobs, which is more new jobs than any other Midwestern state. Illinois is the nation's fourth-largest industrial state, with value-added manufacturing reaching $105 billion. The $71 billion gross output of the 16,100 manufacturers operating in Illinois represents 13.2 percent of the Illinois gross state product.

A copy of the letter follows:

Dear Congressional Leaders:

Several weeks ago, the nation's governors met with the President at the White House and discussed, among other issues, the slowing economy and our shared interest in getting and keeping our citizens in good wage jobs to help stabilize the economies within our respective states. In the short time since that meeting, we have seen the largest monthly loss of jobs in five years, with the Department of Labor reporting 63,000 jobs lost in February alone.

Against this backdrop, the United States Air Force announced that it planned to award an estimated $40 billion contract for aerial refueling tankers to the European Aeronautic Defence & Space Company (EADS) and associate Northrop Grumman Corporation instead of the Boeing Company – an American firm poised to deliver a truly American product with the support of American suppliers from around the United States. If implemented, the decision would result in a net loss of potential American jobs, billions of dollars in tax revenue, an even weaker U.S. dollar, and a larger trade imbalance – all of which contribute to further endangering the long-term health of our economy. The Air Force's decision to award to a foreign-dominated conglomerate the largest Department of Defense (DOD) contract in decades, without considering the economic and trade repercussions for this nation, is disrespectful to the American people.

[to top of second column]

We commend Boeing for appealing the Air Force's decision to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) – an action never before taken by the company. Serious and troubling concerns have been raised about the DOD process, its assumptions and analyses, and the final decision-making that led to this initial contract award. A first look suggests that the Pentagon's contract award and subsequent reports ignore the reality that Boeing and the EADS/Northrop team were assigned identical ratings across all five evaluations factors: (1) Mission Capability; (2) Risk; (3) Past Performance; (4) Cost/Price; and (5) Integrated Fleet Aerial Refueling Assessment. Moreover, an objective review of the data as measured against the Air Force's Request for Proposals shows that Boeing had the better offering in terms of Most Probable Life Cycle Costs, lower risk and better capability. We believe that a thorough, careful review by Congress and other authorities will ultimately confirm these initial findings.

Handing over the tanker contract to a conglomerate dominated by a foreign company carries additional risks and problems not measured in the source-selection process. As the commanders-in-chiefs of the Air National Guard units in our respective states, we find it problematic that the Air Force failed to adequately consider the size of our nation's basing assets. Boeing answered the Air Force's call in the Request for Proposals appropriately by submitting in its bid a medium sized tanker. By selecting EADS, the Air Force apparently ignored its own request and undermined its own base infrastructure with an aircraft too large to utilize some Guard and Air Force hangars. The Pentagon should have considered these military construction requirements and other ancillary costs to the taxpayers.

Boeing has been a leader in the aerospace industry since its beginning in the early part of the twentieth century, supported by innovative and technologically superior supply companies and dedicated workers throughout our states. For Boeing and other U.S. companies to continue to lead the global aerospace industry and create good paying jobs for Americans, Congress must hold the Pentagon accountable for flawed contract decisions. We stand ready to work with you and the Administration to ensure that the tanker selection process is truly transparent and fair so that the contract award goes to the American company that best supports the U.S. military as well as the workers and taxpayers that are the foundation of our national security.

[Text from file received from the Illinois Office of Communication and Information]

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor