Other News...
sponsored by Richardson Repair

No Evidence UK Gov't. Killed Diana

Send a link to a friend

[March 31, 2008]  LONDON (AP) -- The coroner leading the inquest into the death of Princess Diana said Monday that there is no evidence that Prince Philip, the Secret Intelligence Service or any other government agency had anything to do with her death in a 1997 car crash.

Lord Justice Scott Baker told jurors they can decide whether Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, died as the result of an accident, or because of gross negligence by the paparazzi following their car or driver Henri Paul.

But he told jurors they do not have the option to find that Philip or anyone else staged the Paris car accident that killed Diana, Fayed and Paul.

"There is no evidence that the duke of Edinburgh (Prince Philip) ordered Diana's execution, and there is no evidence that the Secret Intelligence Service or any other government agency organized it," he said.

Fayed's father, Mohamed Al Fayed, has long claimed that his son and Diana were killed in a plot orchestrated by the intelligence services and masterminded by Philip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II. He repeated the claims in testimony to the inquest.

Scott Baker began summing up Monday, opening the final chapter in an extraordinary inquest that began Oct. 2.

More than 240 witnesses have given evidence, including Diana's close friends, Prince Philip's private secretary, a former head of the Secret Intelligence Service and Diana's former butler Paul Burrell.

Al Fayed's late bid to force the coroner to summon Prince Philip to testify -- and for written questions to be put to the queen -- was summarily rejected by a higher court.

There has been evidence that Diana feared dying in a car crash, but also had speculated about death in a helicopter or airplane crash; there was testimony that she feared Prince Philip, her former father-in-law.

[to top of second column]

The couple's car crashed as they were pursued from the Ritz Hotel by a pack of paparazzi photographers.

French police concluded that the couple died in an accident, caused in part by excessive speed and by driver Paul's high blood-alcohol level. A British police investigation reached the same conclusion.

As the inquest progressed, some distance opened between Al Fayed and the lawyers working for him.

Michael Mansfield, Al Fayed's main advocate, steered away from accusing Philip or claiming that the British intelligence agents from MI6 assassinated the couple. He did suggest that rogue agents might have been involved.

"Mr. Al Fayed ... has certain beliefs which he has made clear," Mansfield told the coroner on Feb. 20. "He has certain beliefs and I have never at any stage withdrawn any of his beliefs, but you will see I have focused very carefully on elements of what he is suggesting that may be true; in other words, for which there is, forensically, evidence to support his beliefs."

Scott Baker told the jury that some of Al Fayed's claims "have been shown to be so demonstrably without foundation that they are no longer being pursued by (his) lawyer, even if he still continues to believe in their truth in his own mind."

"They are not being pursued because there is not a shred of evidence to support them," he said.

[Associated Press; By ROBERT BARR]

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor