|
Wood energy projects benefit from federal subsidies that developers say are essential. New mandates in many states to increase renewable power use has led to additional incentives. In Massachusetts, for instance, renewable energy must make up 15 percent of the state's electricity supply by 2020, compared with 3.5 percent now. To encourage growth, power plants get a market-based premium for producing renewable energy, currently about $50 per megawatt hour. Wood, however, has far less stored energy than fossil fuels and coal, so more must be gathered, trucked and burned to produce the same power. Higher transportation costs mean wood plants must gather their fuel nearby, limiting where plants can be located. The issue of carbon neutrality is also a point of contention. Opponents say the carbon given off when wood is burned isn't quickly offset by carbon absorbed when a tree grows. Susan Reid of the Conservation Law Foundation sees promise in wood, but warns increasing demand could push the limits of how much wood can be used before forests are damaged. And like any power plant, local opposition can be fierce. A plant in the western Massachusetts town of Russell was delayed this summer after the state said 150 to 240 daily truck trips to the plant would be to disruptive to the downtown region. Developers are determined to move forward, and may build a road that bypasses downtown. "We are in trouble as a nation and we've got to utilize every single electricity production source we can. Whatever it is," said William Hull, one of the developers at the proposed 50 megawatt plant.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor