|
All participants first got local anesthesia to numb their backs. For the fake treatment, doctors simulated the cement injection by pressing the back, tapping instruments and having the strong-smelling cement on hand.
The patients were questioned periodically afterward about their pain, mobility and other measures -- up to six months in the Australian study and one month for the Mayo-led study. The results were similar in both tests.
"Both treatment groups improved, it's just that they improved by about the same amount," said study leader Dr. Rachelle Buchbinder of Cabrini Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
The researchers do not know why people felt better, but suggest it could be due to the anesthesia, the placebo effect or that the fractures healed on their own over time. Kallmes said the procedure may work in a few patients, and that more research is needed to figure out who might benefit.
Kallmes, who's been doing the procedure for 15 years, said he has revamped his practice so that most patients are enrolled in new studies of the procedure. Buchbinder, who treats patients with back pain, said she no longer recommends it.
The Mayo-led study was funded by the National Institutes of Health; some of the researchers have received fees or grants from drug makers and medical equipment companies. The Australian study was also mostly government funded; a medical cement maker provided the cement and some funding.
___
On the Net:
New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org/
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor