|
"Who is Standard & Poor's anyway?" EU spokesman Amadeu Altafaj Tardio said Wednesday. He said the agency should better assess "realities on the ground," such as financial rescue talks in Athens "that are making rapid and solid progress." As investors have recognized the risks in buying debt even from developed economies, credit ratings have lost some credibility with investors, said Richard Kang, chief information officer with Emerging Global Advisors LLC, which runs emerging market funds. He said investors are wondering if more countries haven't been downgraded because of a "reluctance with credit rating agencies to stick their neck out." "When they do downgrade, it will be too late," Kang said, referring to the companies' delays in downgrading billions in toxic mortgage investments in 2006 and 2007. "Credit rating agencies are famous for that." S&P said it's confident in how it rates countries' creditworthiness.
"Our sovereign ratings generally have performed as expected, and we continue to call them as we see them when credit quality changes," spokesman Chris Atkins said. He said S&P improved the quality and transparency of its ratings after the U.S. mortgage meltdown. Analysts now receive more training and are rotated regularly among countries so as not to become beholden to one country's interests. A Moody's spokesman declined to comment on the company's sovereign rating methodology. A Fitch spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Despite the poor publicity of late, the agencies are still generating big money. S&P, owned by the McGraw-Hill Cos., earned $451.5 million in revenue in the first quarter, up 15 percent from a year ago. Moody's saw its first-quarter profit jump 26 percent to $113.4 million as more companies issued debt during the quarter, particularly junk bonds. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. was the largest shareholder of Moody's during the run-up to the financial crisis but has since reduced its stake. The money ratings agencies take in comes from the parties whose products they are rating
-- a point of contention in the U.S. and Europe. At a hearing last week on the agencies' role in the financial crisis, U.S. Sen. Carl Levin called it an "inherent conflict of interest." "It's like one of the parties in court paying the judge's salary, or one of the teams in a competition paying the salary of the referee," the Michigan Democrat said. In S&P's case, countries pay the company $60,000 to $100,000 a year, according to an S&P fee disclosure document. The EU has drafted a code of conduct for rating agencies that takes effect in December. It aims to reduce conflicts of interest and force rating agencies to disclose their methodology.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor