Thursday, December 16, 2010
 
sponsored by

Teachers' tenure being challenged

Send a link to a friend

[December 16, 2010]  SPRINGFIELD -- Statewide school reform appears to be the New Year's resolution for some in Springfield.

As stakeholders gather in Aurora on Thursday to discuss substantial changes to how schools in Illinois operate, a look at the draft plan obtained by Illinois Statehouse News shows that seniority in the education system could lose a lot of its clout.

Tenured teachers and principals would lose any state-granted certifications if they got poor grades on performance evaluations three years in a row during a 10-year period, according to the draft.

Teachers and principals would be allowed to plead their case before the State Teacher Certification Board before revocation of their certification.

Library

Poor performance evaluations could also result in a firing, but teachers would be afforded a hearing to refute their score. Out of this hearing, the superintendent at the school must make one of three recommendations to the local school board: fire the teacher, retain the teacher, or return the teacher to probationary status.

All of these changes pre-empt any previous collective bargaining agreement that protected tenured teachers and principals, according to the draft.

Several sections of the draft refer to the 96th General Assembly, which ends on Jan. 12, when the new Legislature is sworn in. That could mean proponents of the legislation are hoping to capitalize on the lame-duck session and avoid putting the plan through the regular spring session.

That timeline is too quick, according to Sharon Teefey of the Illinois Federation of Teachers. During an Illinois State Board of Education board meeting on Wednesday, Teefey stated the IFT's case against the quick turnaround.


"(IFT is) working with our local union leaders and members, the state board of education, (Illinois State) Superintendent (of Education Chris) Koch, and members of the General Assembly to help shape reforms that can make substantial differences in our schools, but it takes time, and we do recommend that the process that you people have developed and effectively utilized be put in place to ensure that going forward we do the right thing," Teefey said.

School reform has been a big issue in Illinois during the past year.

The current proposal is a follow-up to the Performance Evaluation Reform Act of 2010, which the General Assembly passed in the spring session. The act links teacher evaluations with students' performances on standardized tests. The push for linking the two came out of wanting to bring federal "Race to the Top" money to the state, which didn't happen.

All schools in the state are required to implement the new evaluation process by 2016.

"I would assume some folks would be asking, 'Does this come from Race to the Top?' and some of the ideas we had in our proposal and passed in the performance evaluation law were around these topics, (but) we didn't go as far as this," Koch said.

[to top of second column]

The ideas behind changes recommended in the draft legislation aren't necessarily bad, according to Koch, but the way the Legislature is handling it causes concern.

"It's happening very quickly. ... If there are issues of tenure or teacher dismissal, these are high-stake decisions. We want to make sure we're being fair, that these are thought through carefully," Koch said.

Not everyone shares Koch's and Teefey's concerns about the plan. Advance Illinois is part of a group of education reform advocates that support teachers' evaluations being linked with how well their students do.

"The fact is that all students can, and do, learn, and they learn more when paired with effective teachers. ... If we care about closing our achievement gap, we have to care about developing and retaining effective teachers," said Amy Ballinger-Cole of Advance Illinois.

Water

During the Illinois Board of Education's meeting, members discussed how to avoid cutting state funding for schools next year. In a worst-case scenario presented to the board, the Illinois school system would have to make do with more than $500 million less than it did this fiscal year.

Layoffs haven't specifically been discussed, but if they come to a school, under the proposed draft legislation seniority won't mean what it does currently.

Instead of looking at seniority, school boards will be required to consider a list of "factors including, but not limited to, qualifications, certifications, experience, performance ratings or evaluations, and any other factors relating to a teacher's job performance," the draft reads.

In fact, layoff proceedings "must require the consideration of performance ratings or evaluations prior to experience."

If a school can afford to fill a vacant position, it would be required to look at a candidate's merit and ability to perform the position, while at the same time completely disregarding length of employment at a school.

The other sweeping change included in the plan is creating a three-member fact-finding board to help with collective bargaining discussions that come to a standstill.

[Illinois Statehouse News; By ANDREW THOMASON]

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor