IML indicates the 1 % MUNICIPAL SALES TAX revenue distributed to
municipalities from May thru December was down 10.5% as compared to
the same period last year.
According to the
City Treasurer's recordings the distribution of the Sales Tax to the
City of Lincoln for that period was down 6.32%.
We received
$1,526,915 compared to the $1,630,047 received last year over the
same period last Fiscal Year.
That percentage was
reduced to 4.97% when January is included in the distribution
figures.
IML indicates USE
TAX from May thru December of this Fiscal Year is down 17.1 % from
the same eight month period last year.
According to the
City Treasurer's recordings the Use Tax distributed to the City from
May thru December was 17.1% less than a year ago.
The City received
$122,847 this year and $148,044 last year during this period. If the
January, 2010 distribution is included the percentage is 17.9% less
than last year for the same nine month period.
The IML indicates
the (CPPRT) Corporate Personal Property Replacement Tax revenue
distributed by the State to municipalities from May thru December
was 14.6% less than last year for the same period.
According to the
City Treasurer's recordings the CPPRT distributed to the City during
May thru December was 14.6% less than last Fiscal Year during the
same period.
The City received
$189,094 this year compared to $221,627 received last year.
IML did not report
on NON-HOME RULE SALES TAX OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX since not all
municipalities have a NHR Sales Tax and some have varying rates for
Telecommunications Taxes.
The City of Lincoln
has collected $523,775 in NHR Taxes this year at the end of January
as compared to $562,531 last year. That is a 6.88% decrease.
The
Telecommunications Tax receipts thru January total $361,034 compared
to $332,600 over the same period last year. That represents an 8.62%
increase over last year.
SUMMARY
To date the five
revenue sources reported tonight indicate that those revenue sources
have received $330,488 less at the end of January in FY 2009-2010
than the amount received in those same five revenue sources in FY
2008-2009.
SHOULD THE CITY
COUNCIL BE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS REDUCTION IN REVENUES???
DEFINITELY!!!!!