Thursday, February 04, 2010
 
sponsored by

Gubernatorial candidates split on medical marijuana bill

Send a link to a friend

[February 04, 2010]  SPRINGFIELD (AP) -- Some Republican candidates for Illinois governor would consider allowing marijuana use for medical purposes, but others are sticking by long-held opposition that it would start the state on a slide toward pot legalization.

HardwareThe state Senate agrees that smoking or eating the illegal drug eases pain and nausea in people suffering from a variety of ills, without the sometimes harsh side effects of existing medicine. The Senate voted last spring to approve using marijuana under a doctor's care, but the House failed to go along.

"In narrowly defined instances where a doctor believes this treatment would alleviate the suffering of an individual suffering with a debilitating disease like glaucoma, I would be inclined to allow a licensed doctor to prescribe such treatment," said candidate Dan Proft, a Chicago public relations consultant, in answer to an Associated Press questionnaire.

Exterminator

GOP hopeful Adam Andrzejewski, a suburban Chicago businessman, would support the measure that passed the Senate, and Jim Ryan, former attorney general, would, like Proft, be "open to a narrowly drawn bill."

More than a dozen states allow marijuana use for medicinal purposes.

Strangely, so does Illinois. Medical marijuana was legalized here in 1978, but it has languished; bureaucrats have never implemented the practice.

The pending legislation would set up a public-health registry of people using doctor-approved marijuana to relieve the pain of, for example, Crohn's disease, or the upset stomach caused by chemotherapy. Patients could possess seven plants or 2 ounces of the dried drug.

"People who are seriously ill deserve access to all medical treatments that will help them fight their illness and recover," said Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, while not promising to support specific legislation.

His opponent in the February primary, Comptroller Dan Hynes, did not answer the question. He said he opposes "outright legalization of marijuana" and proposed rewriting drug laws to review priorities and criminal sentencing.

On the opposite end, Green Party candidate Rich Whitney, a Carbondale lawyer, backs general legalization.

"If a bill to legalize marijuana for medical purposes only came to my desk, I would still sign it as a positive first step and a good in and of itself," Whitney said. "But I would continue the fight for full legalization."

[to top of second column]

That's exactly what worries Sen. Bill Brady, R-Bloomington.

"Legalizing medical marijuana appears to me to be nothing more than moving us down the slope of legalizing marijuana," Brady said. "According to experts, there are adequate medical alternatives."

Brady also believes the federal government should be the pharmaceutical regulator. Illinois does not have the resources to determine what treatments are viable.

To Sen. Kirk Dillard, a Hinsdale Republican, enforcement is the key. He opposes medical marijuana, saying authorities are concerned about how they will police the law.

Andy McKenna, a Chicago businessman and former Illinois Republican Party chairman, said he "would have opposed the legislation presented to the Senate."

Internet

Bob Schillerstrom, DuPage County Board chairman, opposes the idea because of what he cites as a lack of research.

"Relatively few studies have been completed on the health benefits relating to the effects of inhaling marijuana as an alternative to currently available treatment," Schillerstrom said.

[Associated Press; JOHN O'CONNOR]

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Library

 

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor