Wednesday, July 28, 2010
 
sponsored by

Blago case goes to jury as defense lawyer says client 'just yakking'

Send a link to a friend

[July 28, 2010]  CHICAGO -- It has been nearly 19 months since federal agents set off one of America's most infamous political scandals, and now it will be up to the jury to decide how the corruption trial of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich ends.

On Tuesday, the prosecution and defense finished up the seven-week trial, which reintroduced Blagojevich to the spotlight in early June.

The 12 jurors and six alternates will be harbored away in a backroom at Chicago's Dirksen Federal Courthouse to decide the fate of Illinois' first impeached governor, far from the camera lights and glitz Blagojevich has brought to the trial. There they will decide whether he is guilty, a finding that could lead to him being sentenced to as much as 415 years in prison.

They will have weeks of testimony from some of Blagojevich's closest friends and advisers, along with mountains of documents and audiotapes at their disposal to make what both sides have declared "an easy decision."

The jury was left with two different impressions of the former governor. The prosecution painted Blagojevich as an arrogant, foul-mouthed, savvy political operator out for himself. Meanwhile, the defense told the jurors they were looking at an arrogant, foul-mouthed buffoon operating on bad advice from his advisers.

Defense attorney Sam Adam Jr. bounded through six weeks of prosecutors' arguments to make up ground for the defense's absence of witnesses. He made his final push on Tuesday to acquit the former Illinois governor with his usual bombast, but without the defiance evident in Monday's hearing.

The showman attorney danced about the courtroom, alternatively yelling and whispering for dramatic effect as he inched closer to the jury box -- at one point apologizing to a juror for accidentally spitting on him. He addressed a wide range of topics, from the prosecution's insider witnesses to Blagojevich's refusal to take the stand, despite Adam Jr.'s promise at the start of the trial.

"I figured at the beginning of the trial I'd have to call Rod up here, but they proved (his innocence) to you in their case," he said. "I wasn't lying to you, but if you don't believe me, blame me."

Adam Jr.'s vocal style stands opposite the prosecution's PowerPoint presentations and dry, straightforward arguments about Blagojevich's alleged schemes. Adam Jr.'s mouth has also introduced him to a whole bunch of hot water, drawing Judge James Zagel's ire throughout the case -- a trend that continued during the closing statements. Zagel sustained numerous objections from the prosecution concerning the celebrity attorney's tone and message -- including a drawn-out joke.

"Wholly inappropriate," lead prosecutor Reid Schar said.

"It's supposed to be an argument summing up," Zagel told Adam Jr. "I think they're objecting because it's becoming more of a show."

Adam Jr. did get down to details, taking on numerous prosecution witnesses and their testimony about the alleged shakedowns. Blagojevich's attorney challenged the notion that the ex-governor illegally demanded campaign dollars for state action, emphasizing that the governor approved action before asking for contributions. Time and again, Adam Jr. said, Blagojevich's alleged targets "got the bill signed and he got nothing."

He pointed to testimony from road-builder Gerry Krozel that Blagojevich tried to shake him down in exchange for a $6 billion capital bill. The government argues the governor approved a $1.8 billion project to whet Krozel's appetite to give. The defense, however, said his approval substantiated Blagojevich's case.

"They want you to convict him of extortion because he gave the (road-building) industry $1.8 billion," he said. "He promised the $1.8 billion and did it and then asked for a contribution -- how could it be one for the other?"

"That is not the law," Zagel interrupted him. "The law I give you is what you must follow. ... You will (only) apply your facts to that law."

Federal prosecutors would later clarify for the jury that an illegal exchange can still occur if state action, such as a bill signing, takes place before a campaign contribution or other form of political gain.

The prosecution's frequent objections can do more than just clarify. There are strategic considerations at hand, according to criminal defense attorney John Lag. Closing arguments are generally smooth rides with little interruption from either side. Objections, however, can be used to interrupt an attorney's train of thought and limit the impact of the final argument.

"There's a professional courtesy and civility not to interrupt the other side (during closings)," he said. "That courtesy was not returned by the prosecution to the defense."

One of the facts Blagojevich's team is counting on is convincing the jury Blagojevich was engaged in political horse-trading, rather than corruption. Adam Jr. replayed some of the FBI wiretaps of Blagojevich discussing President Barack Obama's former U.S. Senate seat. Adam Jr. argued that the ex-governor intended to choose Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan for the seat in order to win concessions from her father, powerful Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago.

"He was trying to get 300,000 people health care; he was trying to make sure a capital bill would result; he was trying to make sure disabled veterans didn't have to pay property taxes," he said of Blagojevich's aims for the Senate seat. "This isn't extortion -- this is a negotiation."

The defense has long argued that Blagojevich's alleged scheming is typical in politics. Adam Jr. continued to hammer this point home by discussing Blagojevich's political crisis and his desire to get his agenda passed to improve it.

The defense attorney blasted the advisers surrounding Blagojevich who took the stand against their former boss, from law school roommate and former aide Lon Monk -- who took money -- to former deputy governors Brad Tusk -- a bright, but untrustworthy guy -- and Bob Greenlee -- a coward.

"Greenlee took more than $100,000 a year to advise this man," Adam Jr. said pointing at Blagojevich. "Who are we kidding when he says, 'I was trying to disagree by agreeing.' ... He was BS-ing you."

The presence of political insiders and personal friends on the witness stand has served as the backbone of the government's case against Blagojevich.

[to top of second column]

Adam Jr. repeatedly tried to raise doubts about the credibility of Blagojevich's cooperating alleged co-conspirators. He said the advisers' conversations with Blagojevich on tape represent a failure on their part to properly inform the ex-governor that his plans were illegal.

Nearly all of those insiders admitted under cross-examination to appeasing the governor out of fear of being ostracized.

"Name just one time ... where (his advisers) say, 'You can't do this, Governor,'" he said. "They said, 'You could do it'; not only that, they said, 'You should do it.'"

Schar said Blagojevich didn't need his advisers to tell him he was crossing the line, highlighting his law degree, career as a criminal prosecutor and his completion of frequent ethics examinations. The prosecutor tried to dispel the defense's notion that Blagojevich's apparent ignorance of the law served as excuse for his actions.

"This guy has more background in (criminal law) than most lawyers and somehow he became the accidentally corrupt governor," the prosecutor declared. "It's no one's job to stop him from committing a crime but the defendant's. It's his job."

The legal nuances of the case, however, represented only a small part of the divergent portraits of the governor's actions in office. A trial that has been so absorbed in personality saw the attorneys battle for the jury's impression of the defendant sitting before the court.

Adam Jr. took aim at his own client, along with his former associates. The attorney acknowledged Blagojevich's character flaws, including his insecurity, ignorance and foul mouth, eliciting some laughs and awkward smiles from the jury.

"He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer," he said while reviewing the FBI recordings. "He was just yakking -- if you put Joan and Melissa Rivers in the same room, you wouldn't get that much talk."

Library

Schar, however, shot right back at the defense, countering the "Blagojevich as buffoon" image the governor played out in court and on reality television. It appeared a reluctant compliment.

"He is not stupid; he's very smart," Schar said. "He knows how to communicate -- that's what he does for a living ... and he knows how to get his message across."

Schar was not the only one at odds with Blagojevich's attorneys.

The judge and Adam Jr. squared off on Monday when the attorney threatened to defy Zagel's orders to leave out witnesses who were passed over by the prosecution, including convicted influence peddler Tony Rezko. Adam Jr. stayed away from the issue.

But he wasn't happy about it.

"I didn't give the closing argument I wanted to give," he said outside the courtroom. "I wanted to get into all the things that all the people and all the witnesses that they didn't call."

Schar's rebuttal to more than two hours of Adam's elaborate performance briefly referenced Blagojevich's brother and former fundraiser Robert.

"There is no doubt Rod Blagojevich dragged his brother into this conspiracy," Schar said. "He knew and continued to participate."

Robert Blagojevich, the Tennessee businessman, faces four charges, including attempted extortion and bribery, in connection with his brother's alleged attempt to sell the Senate seat. Schar said the tapes show Robert mixing fundraising with governance.

The judge will provide the jurors with dozens of instructions, which will guide them through their deliberations. But even that process proved contentious. The prosecution and defense negotiated the extensive list of instructions, which include guidelines for each of the 23 charges and what is needed to reach a verdict.

Blagojevich's attorneys sought to lose language in three areas of the instruction list, which they said muddied the waters of acquittal. Marc Martin, the defense's jury expert, challenged the prosecution's list of what factors are not needed to convict the ex-governor.

The prosecution considers such points critical for a jury that may be unclear about what exactly qualifies as reasonable doubt in its deliberations. That much was clear when Assistant U.S. Attorney Chris Niewohner told jurors on Monday that Blagojevich did not have to successfully commit a crime in order to be found guilty.

But Martin claimed the instructions on what was needed to convict were sufficient for the jury. Anything more could shift the burden to the defense.

Zagel was unconvinced, overruling Martin's objection, along with two other similar arguments.

The jury will now take those instructions on Wednesday in connection with a bevy of corruption charges, including extortion, bribery and wire fraud.

[Illinois Statehouse News; By BILL McMORRIS]

Internet

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor