|
Arthur E. Berman, a Houston-based petroleum geologist who's questioned the headlong rush to open up shale fields on economic grounds, said the environmental risks have been overblown. "We have been doing hydraulic fracturing for 50, 60 years and there is no evidence whatsoever that there has been ground or surface water contamination," he said. He said only "point-5 percent" of what goes into a well were chemicals, and those were mostly "common chemicals that you would put in your swimming pool or hot tub, something like chlorine." "Having said that, the companies should come clean and reveal the content (of the chemicals they use)," he said. "We're dealing with people's fears, and that's justified."
He said water conservation was a bigger issue because wells require as much as 10 million gallons of water. Drillers said leaks are rare because a well is covered in a steel casing capped at both ends with cement. "Fracturing has a long and clear record of safely leveraging otherwise unreachable homegrown, clean-burning, job-creating energy reserves," said Lee Fuller, the head of Energy In Depth, a Washington-based coalition of natural gas and oil producers. In response to environmental concerns, Fuller said the industry has been drawing up standards for well casings and how to best handle the fluids in wells. He said efforts in Congress to regulate fracking should be halted until the EPA study was completed.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor