Tuesday, May 11, 2010
 
sponsored by

Feds: Blagojevich's motion to delay trial 'frivolous'

Send a link to a friend

[May 11, 2010]  CHICAGO (AP) -- Federal prosecutors scorned the latest request by ousted Gov. Rod Blagojevich's attorneys to delay his corruption trial, saying it was frivolous and should be quickly dismissed by an appeals court.

The trial is scheduled to begin June 3, and the weeks beforehand should not get bogged down in frivolous skirmishing, prosecutors told the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a filing late Friday and again Monday. They asked the court to rule on the former governor's request "on an expedited basis in order to definitely resolve the issue."

But Blagojevich's lawyers said Monday that it would be unfair to allow the trial to start before the Supreme Court resolves a challenge to the so-called honest-services fraud law, which is the basis for several of the charges against Blagojevich.

They scoffed at prosecutors' claim that the argument had no merit.

"They always say that; what else are they going to say?" Blagojevich attorney Samuel E. Adam said Monday.

Exterminator

U.S. Attorney's Office spokesman Randall Samborn declined comment.

One complication is that the appeals court told defense attorneys to file briefs about their delay request by June 16 -- 13 days after Zagel has scheduled the trial to get under way. Attorneys said it was unclear exactly how that would affect matters.

As the fight over the trial date heated up, U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel called prosecutors and defense attorneys in for a previously unscheduled meeting Tuesday.

Blagojevich is accused of trying to sell or trade President Barack Obama's old U.S. Senate seat. As governor, he had the power to fill the seat when Obama was elected to the White House. Blagojevich also is charged with plotting to illegally pressure potential campaign contributors.

His brother, Nashville businessman Robert Blagojevich, is charged with helping him.

Both men have pleaded not guilty.

[to top of second column]

The indictment is largely based on a controversial federal law that makes it illegal to deny taxpayers their intangible right to the honest services of public officials. Critics say the law is unfairly vague.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said in a recent case that the law is so vague it could make it a crime for a mayor to use his political clout to get a good table at a restaurant. The high court is expected to make a decision on the law by the end of June, after Blagojevich's trial begins.

Federal prosecutors have rewritten the Blagojevich indictment so fewer charges are based on the honest services law and have indicated that they may drop the honest-services counts if the Supreme Court modifies or erases the law.

But Blagojevich attorneys said they need to know in their opening statements exactly what violations are going to be alleged in the indictment when the case is turned over to the jury. They filed a motion with the appeals court Friday. The attorneys have twice asked for a later trial date.

"A fair trial is impossible under the current ruling of the District Court," the Blagojevich attorneys told the appeals court.

[Associated Press]

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor