|
But they don't know exactly how or why the gas escaped. And they don't know why the blowout preventer didn't seal the well pipe at the sea bottom after the eruption, as it was supposed to. The details of BP's internal report have been closely guarded -- and only a short list of people saw it ahead of its release. Mark Bly, BP's group head of safety and operations, compiled the report and said in May that there was a gas plume before the explosion. "This was a pretty large plume of gas ... I think it was a large enough where there was a high likelihood it would have ignited," he said. There were other signs of problems, including an unexpected loss of fluid from a pipe known as a riser five hours before the explosion that could have indicated a leak in the blowout preventer. Witness statements show that rig workers talked just minutes before the blowout about pressure problems in the well. At first, nobody seemed too worried, workers have said. Then panic set in. Workers called their bosses to report that the well was "coming in" and that they were "getting mud back." The drilling supervisor, Jason Anderson, tried to shut down the well. It didn't work. At least two explosions turned the rig into an inferno. Members of Congress, industry experts and workers who survived the rig explosion have accused BP's engineers of cutting corners to save time and money on a project that was 43 days and more than $20 million behind schedule at the time of the blast.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor