|
Robert Doll, chief equity strategist for money manager BlackRock in New York, doesn't think a recession is likely, but he isn't ruling one out. Still, he's bullish on stocks because so many companies are making money overseas. That means trouble in the U.S. economy matters less to U.S. stocks. "The U.S. stock market and the U.S. economy are increasingly unrelated," Doll says. "If the U.S. economy is muddling through, the stock market can certainly rise significantly." Curtis Jensen, chief investment officer of Third Avenue Management, also likes the international exposure many of U.S. companies. His firm, which manages $15 billion in assets, spent $210 million on Monday and Tuesday alone scooping up stocks. But he adds that he doesn't think the S&P 500 is a bargain -- only some stocks. "It's not time for the shotgun approach
-- buying the whole market," he says. Stocks are cheap using one measure known as the forward price-to-earnings ratio, or forward P/E. For example, if a company is expected to earn $4 per share over the next year and its stock trades at $64, the forward P/E is 16. That's roughly the historical average. Stocks in the S&P 500 are trading at a forward P/E of about 12, according to research firm Capital IQ. If you believe analyst projections, that suggests stocks are a bargain now. You're paying less for each dollar of expected earnings.
At that price, investors far from retirement age, or those without much savings in stocks, may feel like buying. The problem, says Yale's Shiller, is it's difficult for investors to judge whether to buy by looking at a single year's earnings for companies
-- much less estimates of a year that hasn't started. Earnings vary year to year depending on business cycles. So his idea, championed first by investment legend Benjamin Graham in the Depression, is to divide stock prices by their average annual earnings over a decade, adjusted for inflation. Using that measure, stocks in the S&P 500 are trading at 20 times their earnings
-- hardly cheap. That's about the average for stock prices over the 50 years, suggesting stock prices now are pretty much where they should be. Another way of looking at stocks is to compare their prices with Federal Reserve estimates of something called book value
-- what a company would have left if it had to shut down, sell its assets and pay back its lenders. According to Andrew Smithers of Smithers & Co., an investing consultancy in London, stocks over the past century have traded at about 0.64 times this measure. Today, the S&P 500 is trading at 0.93 times
-- suggesting stocks are too expensive. Smithers says he's not buying now. "I'd be wary of putting too much in the market," says Shiller. "There's a good chance they'll fall. It's hard to predict the market."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor