While a comprehensive reform plan was recently introduced in the
Illinois House of Representatives, state teachers' unions laid out
their own proposed changes Monday during an Illinois Senate
committee hearing. The unions want school administrators and local
school boards to be more responsible for what happens in a school
district. Additionally, they are seeking professional training for
school board members; a second certification for principals, based
on performance evaluations; and a list of programs that districts
must maintain, said Ken Swanson, president of the Illinois Education
Association.
The proposals come after several special House committee hearings
in December, during which union representatives testified about
their concerns regarding the original plan. Swanson said Monday's
proposed changes were the product of feedback after the House
hearings.
Several union representatives said that not all parts of the
state's first draft of reform are ill-conceived. Like the proposal
in the House, the unions would have performance ratings established
in the Performance Evaluation and Review Act of 2010 count heavily
when districts fill new and vacant positions.
"What we are proposing is all predicated on a successful
implementation of the PERA evaluation system so that we have a
credible, solid base of reliable evaluations to work from. That is,
in our view, absolutely critical," Swanson said.
All schools in the state are slated to have the new evaluation
system in place by 2016.
Additionally, like the House version of the plan, the unions want
to see tenure based on good evaluation scores. The unions, however,
want the length of time for earning tenure shortened from four years
to three years, barring no poor evaluations.
Swanson said that under the unions' plan, teachers who have
received tenure in one district should get tenure in another
district in two years with proficient or excellent evaluations.
[to top of second column] |
Crafting significant reform from a shotgun blast of ideas and
draft plans isn't the best way to accomplish change, said Kimberly
Lightford, co-chair of the Senate's Special Committee on Education
Reform.
"I have a concern that at the end of the day we'll have 10 bills
from every interested party on what they think is the dynamic to
education reform," the Maywood Democrat said.
She asked Darren Reisberg, deputy state superintendent of the
Illinois Board of Education, if his agency should have more input in
the process.
"It's a lot more difficult ... when you have bills coming in all
directions and it's not very clear who will be trying to hash all of
that out. ... I think there are some merits for us being more
involved in the process," Reisberg said.
The legislation introduced in the House must be passed before the
new General Assembly gets sworn in on Jan. 12. Otherwise, the whole
legislative process would have to start again.
Lightford emphasized that she didn't want to move too quickly on
such a sweeping piece of legislation and wanted to time hear and
consider all facets of any changes.
[Illinois
Statehouse News; By ANDREW THOMASON]
|