Friday, January 21, 2011
 
sponsored by

Old overdue bills still an issue for Illinois

Send a link to a friend

[January 21, 2011]  SPRINGFIELD -- The state's stack of unpaid bills will soon double despite an income tax increase, according to state Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka.

The four-year, temporary personal income tax hike of 67 percent was approved on the final day of the previous General Assembly legislature and recently signed by Gov. Pat Quinn. In part, the income tax hike is designed to help Illinois catch up on past-due bills and stop being delinquent on its payments.

"Our current backlog of bills stands at $6 billion, and the increased revenues will help address this backlog," said Kelly Kraft, spokeswoman for the governor's Office of Management and Budget.

Not quite, according to Topinka, who is in charge of Illinois' checkbook.

"By the time we get through four years from now and all of this and what they're able to spend, we will probably have a debt of $12 billion of unpaid bills that have yet to be dealt with," the Riverside Republican said.

Topinka said her office is now working on getting last August's bills paid.

A plan to issue $8.75 billion in bonds to get social services, hospitals and others the money they are due was introduced at the same time as the tax increase, but the measure did not pass.

State Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, has reintroduced the bill in the new legislature as Senate Bill 3. Democrats, who were the only ones to vote for the tax hike, said borrowing is essential to relieving the state's financial distress.

"Without this component of the plan, school districts, social service providers, hospitals and other state vendors will continue to struggle for survival as we slowly climb out of this fiscal hole," Cullerton spokeswoman Rikeesha Phelon said.

Because the plan involves borrowing, it needs three-fifths of the legislature to vote aye. That means Republicans who didn't support the tax increase would have to support borrowing.

"Republicans have to be willing to support the plan or be ready to tell school districts and hospitals to suck it up while the party makes a political point," Phelon added.

Shortly after the income tax increase passed the state House of Representatives, House Republican Leader Tom Cross said his caucus would be willing to consider voting for borrowing, but not without some concessions.

"We'll look at it to pay our vendors, but we're going to look at it a different way. It might be a smaller amount; we might say you've got to cut somewhere else; we might say you have to look at (workers' compensation) -- I don't know what else we might say," Cross said.

For her part, Topinka has not decided one way or another on the borrowing plan.

"It will help to some extent, in terms of paying the bills. I still want to look at that before we sign off on it and see exactly where it goes. I want to read that bill and see exactly what it does. I've signed off on borrowing when I was (state) treasurer, but not all the time," she said.

[to top of second column]

However, the bonds do not need Topinka's approval to be issued. Unlike short-term borrowing, which requires the comptroller and the treasurer to give the OK, long-term bonds only need approval from the General Assembly and governor.

While the legislature works on the borrowing, Topinka said she is trying to make things so she can pay bills incrementally. Currently, any receipt given to the state has to be paid in full, which has caused a lot of problems, according to Topinka.

"If the legislature would allow us to pay at least some of it, then at least we can get -- especially with smaller businesses, who might be holding on by their fingertips -- we will get them something in an orderly, predictable fashion," she said.

Some is better than none, said Mike Heath, executive director for Good Samaritan House Ministries, a soup kitchen, food pantry and shelter assistance service in the southern Illinois city of Carbondale.

"If you don't know at all when it's coming, that's not a good thing, because you can't plan ahead. If you've got a date, knowing you're going to get part of it, that's better from a budget point of view than knowing nothing," Heath said.

Until social services and vendors get paid by the state, they either have to find the money elsewhere or stop the programs all together.

"You've got to have money to pay your bills. It's that simple," Heath said.

[Illinois Statehouse News; By ANDREW THOMASON]

Library

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor