|
The SEC acknowledged in September that some documents likely were destroyed under the former agency policy that was changed last year. However, the SEC said it didn't believe any current or future investigations were harmed by the policy, which allowed documents to be tossed out in cases that were closed when staffers decided a formal probe wasn't warranted. The information contained in the documents that were discarded may be available from sources inside or outside the SEC, the agency said. The SEC's current policy requires all documents to be kept whether they are part of a preliminary probe that is closed or one that develops into a formal investigation. The agency says the policy and practices meet its legal obligations. SEC spokesman John Nester said Tuesday the agency was pleased that Kotz's review "found no evidence of any improper motive on the part of current or former SEC staff" or of harm to investigations. "We will continue to work closely with (the National Archives) to resolve any outstanding issues," Nester said. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, a longtime critic of the SEC, said the documents issue "is a messy situation that the SEC needs to clean up, using the guidance and recommendations in this report as a start." In addition, Grassley said, Kotz should conduct a separate audit of what records were destroyed and the potential effect on enforcement cases.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor