|
3. First-day investing is like rolling the dice. You'll almost certainly pay more for a stock on its first day of open trading than those who bought in at the offer price. During the last decade, the first market price of newly issued stocks has been an average 11 percent higher than the offer price, according to Jay Ritter, a University of Florida finance professor who has analyzed IPO data. Beyond that, though, the price is wildly unpredictable for the first couple of days. Among this year's hot issues, the price of online professional networking service LinkedIn more than doubled on its debut day and that of real estate website Zillow shot up 79 percent. But both are slightly down since then. Pandora Media soared as much as 62 percent on Day One, then tumbled all the way back below the issue price by the end of Day Two. The risk of buying a stock before company earnings and analyst reports are issued is that it's seriously overvalued, advises Reena Aggarwal, director of the Center for Financial Markets and Policy at Georgetown University. "There's a difference between a great company and a great investment," she says. "Generally, the first day after an IPO is not the time to buy it." 4. Sales are key. Investors shouldn't necessarily rule out companies that have losses on their pre-IPO income statements. A key indicator to focus on is revenue or sales. But don't confuse sales growth with profitable growth, as investors did in the speculative bubble before many dot-coms went bust in 2000. Instead, says Menlow, look to see whether revenues are moving upward as any losses decline. How soon will it be before the company will be profitable? Sales may be a particularly important gauge when deciding whether to invest in smaller IPOs. A study conducted by Ritter found that companies with less than $50 million in annual sales
-- about half of the 7,354 IPOs from 1980-2009 -- have underperformed the market by 35 percent in the first three years after going public. Companies that went public with more than $50 million in sales, meanwhile, underperformed by 2 percent. 5. The long-term outlook is poor. IPOs aren't usually a good match for the buy-and-hold investor, because in the long run they underperform the market. The trend for a typical IPO over the years has been for its stock price to be higher after six months and then gradually decline to below the offering price within two to three years. About 20 percent fail within five years. So how do you distinguish which ones might flourish? The Federal Reserve identified two characteristics of successful IPOs in a 2004 study: The companies have been around longer than other companies issuing stock for the first time, and they're making a profit before they do so. Aside from those factors, hoping to hit it big with an IPO can prove to be wishful thinking.
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor