|
Sometimes, the official's aggressiveness can cost a team dearly. Chicago linebacker Brian Urlacher was flagged for what appeared to be a legit shoulder-on-shoulder tackle on Detroit's Tony Scheffler during a Monday night game. The Lions scored on the next play and went on win.
Urlacher wasn't fined -- tacit acknowledgment from the league that the hit was legal. He won't lose any money, but he won't get his 15 yards back, either.
"When you're out there with 22 bodies flying around in real time, to an official it certainly looked like it was a hit with a shoulder to the head and neck area," Anderson said. "Now when you and I get the benefit of seeing it in slow motion from four or five different angles in HDTV, then we can go back and make the determination that, you know what, it was shoulder-and-shoulder.
"And it's OK if that's the result because once again what we've instructed our officials is player safety, particularly around the head and neck area, is so vital, to be aggressive and protecting in those instances."
Still, as Young's case pointed out, even the perspective of replay doesn't always produce an outcome that makes sense to everyone involved. Tennessee defensive end Jason Jones, who is appealing a $15,000 fine for a hit on Denver's Kyle Orton, said it's still "kind of vague" to him when a player becomes defenseless.
"I wish they could get a better definition of it," Jones said, "and a better fining system, too."
The NFL feels it has gone to great lengths to explain the rules. Part of the issue, as Anderson notes, is the difficulty in changing "a culture and a mindset that has heretofore been accepting of those kind of hits in the head-and-neck area. ... That's going to take some time."
"We would certainly acknowledge that one of our challenges is to continue to educate about the rules and continue to try to encourage players and coaches to keep referring back to the specifics of the rule book, keep referring back to the videos, keep referring back to the other training materials we try to send out to give them clarity," Anderson said.
"We think the rules are a lot clearer than they've ever been before. ... We try to be as definitive as we can with regard to what is and what is not illegal. I guess it's never going to be a perfect world, but we're trying awfully hard to get them as much education as we possibly can."
[Associated Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor