|
Hamada sued Olympus in 2008, saying an internal transfer was punishment for relaying a supplier's complaint that its best employees were being lured away by Olympus. Hamada first relayed the complaints to his boss, then to the company's compliance unit. Last month, the Tokyo High Court reversed an earlier district court decision and ordered Olympus to pay Hamada 2.2 million yen ($29,000) in damages for the transfer from a sales division, where he had a good record, to a more solitary assignment in research, and later in quality control. Olympus appealed last week, sending the case that pits the little "salaryman" against a giant of Japan Inc. to the highest court. The outcome would set a precedent for how Japanese companies deal with
whistle-blowers. Olympus, which has called the Tokyo High Court ruling "regrettable," said it decided to appeal because the court decision was vastly different from its view. The Supreme Court may decide against hearing Hamada's case. But then, the Tokyo High Court decision will stand
-- a victory for Hamada. All Hamada wants is to be a salesman again, the post he had before the reprisals began. He boasts he won a trophy as the best Olympus salesman in the U.S. during his overseas stint in the late 1990s and early last decade. When he appears in court, he makes a point of wearing a blue tie, the Olympus color. "I have always wanted to make Olympus a better company and elevate the Olympus brand," he said. "I have no regrets. I have confidence I did the right thing."
[Associated
Press;
Copyright 2011 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries
Community |
Perspectives
|
Law & Courts |
Leisure Time
|
Spiritual Life |
Health & Fitness |
Teen Scene
Calendar
|
Letters to the Editor