Saturday, July 07, 2012
 
sponsored by

City says no to a new fire truck ... for now

Send a link to a friend

[July 07, 2012]  When the city council went into their regular voting session for the first Monday of the month, there were a few items to be addressed before the meeting moved back to the purchase of a new fire truck.

When the time came, Alderwoman Kathy Horn made the motion to approve the purchase of a new fire truck. The motion included giving Chief Mark Miller the authority to spend up to $368,000 for an in-stock vehicle.

From the same side of the room, Alderwoman Melody Anderson seconded the motion, and it was opened to the floor for discussion.

Across the room, the first person to speak up was Alderwoman Marty Neitzel, who immediately said she wished Horn would have tabled the motion for further discussion next week.

From that same side of the room, Alderman Tom O'Donohue then said he wasn't going to vote for a vehicle that doesn't exist, to which Horn countered that the vehicle did exist and that Miller knows where it is.

Neitzel then questioned why the council wasn't going to consider the vehicle that she had gone to see in Springfield.

The discussion bounced back to side one as Alderman Jeff Hoinacki pointed out that Chuck Conzo, city treasurer, had suggested the city wait to hear from CEFCU on their loan interest rates.

Kitty-corner across the room, O'Donohue weighed in again, saying he wanted to make it clear he was not "anti-fire truck," but he wanted to know the exact amount that was going to be spent. He also noted that he did not want to give Miller the authority to spend money. He qualified this by saying it wasn't a matter of not trusting Miller; it was just a matter of not wanting to give that kind of authority to any department head.

Crossing to midfield, Alderwoman Jonie Tibbs argued that Miller was the right person to give the authority to because he knew what he was doing.

[to top of second column]

Up the line, Alderman Buzz Busby stood with O'Donohue, saying that the city has never spent $370,000 without knowing who it was going to and where it was going to come from.

While several of the aldermen had not voiced an opinion during any of the discussions Monday night, they made their opinion clear when the item came to vote.

With all 10 aldermen present for the vote, David Armbrust, Stacy Bacon, Busby , Hoinacki, Neitzel, O'Donohue and Wilmert voted no. Only Anderson, Horn, and Tibbs voted yes.

With the motion failed, the council moved on to other business.

After the meeting however, Neitzel, who had been among the most vocal during the committee meeting and voting session, said that the city will eventually get this all ironed out. She said, "We have to know what we're doing, and we have to do it right."

[By NILA SMITH]

Previous related articles

< Top Stories index

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching and Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law and Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health and Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor