The committee discussed a $530,000 grant the county will receive for
the public transportation program. Angie Jenkins, Jacob Sexton and
Kathy Inman, all of whom work for Community Action, which oversees
the public transportation program, were at the meeting to explain
the progress that has been made within the program.
the executive director of Community Action, began by providing some
statistics as to the transportation program's services. Between July
1, 2012, and May 31, 2013, the program provided 17,086 rides,
covering 369 riders and traveling 88,697 miles. These numbers apply
to Logan County only; Mason County is not included in the figures.
Currently, the program operates with six vans and nine drivers.
Predominantly, riders have been senior citizens, people who live in
group homes and the developmentally disabled. Riders arrange in
advance for transportation, with standing appointments preferred.
"It is by far a successful program, and we're not even a year
into it," said Sexton.
Sexton and Angie Jenkins explained that the program is a
not-for-profit organization. While there is a suggested donation
that can be paid to the organization, there is no required fee for
seniors to ride in one of the vans. There is a fare for the general
public of any age. Money that is brought in is used by the
organization specifically to help offset costs.
Andy Anderson asked if Community Action was looking into
transporting more groups of people. Sexton said they have been
approved for larger vehicles by IDOT, which means they will be able
to transport larger groups. Sexton also said that they are looking
to work with rehabilitation centers, hospitals and possibly local
colleges in the near future.
Gene Rohlfs asked Sexton how large the Community Action budget
for next year will be. Sexton said the transportation program alone
will operate on a budget of $500,000.
Rohlfs also asked how Community Action plans to replace and
repair vans if needed. Jenkins answered that the vans, which are
titled under Community Action, have to be approved by IDOT for
repairs or replacements after careful consideration and inspection.
New vans bought in the future will be titled under Logan County.
Chuck Ruben said the money for this program is federal money
funneled through the state to Community Action.
Sexton told the committee that while Community Action has been
providing senior transportation for some time, the program only
recently became more open to the public. Jenkins said the program in
some form has been in place for 40 years.
Rohlfs asked Sexton how much revenue from fares was brought in by
the program. Sexton reiterated that this is a not-for-profit
program, and he said it was not a figure he could provide at that
"The fares offset the expenses of the program. We're not allowed
to generate an income. When we do, it goes back to supplement the
program," Sexton said.
Rohlfs said that such a program is set up to be a financial loss.
Sexton replied that from Community Action's perspective, the program
is stimulating growth within the communities with the money that
goes into sales taxes being spent and work done by the people who
are being transported.
Sexton also said that Illinois is seeing a large increase in
popularity for public transportation.
Rohlfs said that is his reason for concern, and if more rural
areas gain this type of not-for-profit transportation, the cost will
become too high for any governing body.
Sexton replied by saying: "I think there's a significant
difference between us, a not-for-profit, non-revenue-generating,
community-stimulating service industry, and a for-profit entity like
Amtrak. I think this is only a good thing for the community."
[to top of second column]
Terry Carlton said he feels it is imperative for such a program
to exist, in order for members of the community who are limited by a
lack of transportation to get where they need to be to improve their
own lives. Carlton emphasized the importance of working with
colleges in the near future, so younger people can receive an
education locally and get better jobs.
Anderson said he thinks there is a potential for a lot of growth
for this program, and he complimented Sexton on the effort Community
Action has put into this so far.
Sexton also said the program could provide a benefit for those
who move to Logan County who do not have a vehicle. Those people
could be from other rural areas, or from a city, where it is less
likely for people to have their own transportation, due to
congestion and high costs.
Sexton said that transporting people to work would be an example
of helping to stimulate the economy.
Rohlfs said it is also likely that some people who do not have
transportation do not have a job, either, and they will not be
contributing to growth.
"Our focus would be to engage people in low-income areas to
ultimately promote them to self-sufficiency so they can be
contributing members to the community," said Sexton.
Pamela Meagher commented, saying that lack of a transportation
program would only make the situation worse for those who do not
have access to a vehicle and want to be productive members of
While the program is running in two counties (a correction from
the previous meeting, in which three counties were indicated), Logan
County will specifically act as the recipient of the grant that
funds the transportation program. As a result, Logan County will
have to find an employee referred to as the PCOM officer, for
project compliance and oversight management, who will spend a
majority of their time monitoring the process of expenditures.
Sally Litterly suggested that such a position could be run
through GIS or the highway department. Litterly said she has talked
with other county clerks as to what they have been doing with such a
program, and several gave that answer. In addition, there is
information that is still disorganized.
"There's so much out there that the state doesn't even know what
is going on, nor can they convey to these PCOM people what is going
on," said Litterly.
Meagher, who has been attending seminars and classes on this
position, said she would be willing to take on duties of the PCOM.
However, Meagher also serves the county board as board secretary and
as the insurance administrator. Meagher suggested that the county
move some of her duties for those positions to other offices within
the county, as being the PCOM is projected to take a lot of time.
As the discussion wound down, a vote was taken on a motion to
continue to act as the grant recipient and work on the task of
appointing a PCOM. The motion was approved 4-1, with Rolhfs voting
no. The full board will discuss this issue later in the month.
Committee members present were chairman David Hepler, Robert
Farmer, Rick Aylesworth, Gene Rohlfs and Chuck Ruben. Jan
Schumacher, Andy Anderson, Terry Carlton were also present for the
discussion. Angie Jenkins, Jacob Sexton and Kathy Inman were at the
meeting to represent Community Action. Pamela Meagher, Sally
Litterly and Vicki Dugan from county offices were also present.
[By DEREK HURLEY]