Buying or selling organs has long been illegal, punishable by five
years in jail. The 1984 National Organ Transplantation Act that set
the payment ban didn't just refer to solid organs — it included bone
marrow transplants, too.
Thousands of people with leukemia and other blood diseases are saved
each year by bone marrow transplants. Thousands more, particularly
minorities, still have trouble finding a genetically compatible
match even though millions of volunteers have registered as
potential donors under the current altruistic system.
A few years ago, the libertarian Institute for Justice sued the
government to challenge that system. It argued that more people with
rare marrow types might register to donate — and not back out later
if they're found to be a match — if they had a financial incentive
such as a scholarship paid by a nonprofit group.
Ultimately, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled
that some, not all, marrow donors could be compensated — citing a
technological reason. Years ago, the only way to get marrow cells
was to extract them from inside bone. Today, a majority of donors
give marrow-producing cells through a blood-filtering process that's
similar to donating blood plasma. Because it's legal to pay plasma
donors, the December 2011 court ruling said marrow donors could be
paid, too, as long as they give in that newer way.
"They're not even transplanting your bone marrow. They're
transplanting these baby blood cells," said Jeff Rowes, an attorney
with the Institute for Justice. It represented some families who'd
had trouble finding donors, and was pushing for a study of
compensation as a next step.
Not so fast, says the Obama administration. The government now has
proposed a regulation to keep the ban intact by rewriting some legal
definitions to clarify that it covers marrow-producing stem cells no
matter how they're derived.
[to top of second column]
"It is not a matter of how you obtain it," said Shelley Grant of the
Health Resources and Services Administration's transplant division.
"Whether we obtain them through the marrow or the circulatory
system, it is those stem cells that provide a potential cure."
The proposal is open for public comment through Monday.
"Should we be paying for parts of people's bodies which then can be
used to help other people?" said Mary Ann Baily, a Hastings Center
fellow who has long studied the question of transplant compensation.
"We've been very reluctant to do that partly because it's a very
messy thing to do and to manage so that bad things don't happen,"
such as exploiting the poor.
Moreover, some patients fare better with marrow cells derived from
bone, said Dr. Jeffrey Chell of Be the Match, the National Marrow
Donor Program. The registry opposes financial incentives as "really
another form of coercion," he said, noting that international
registries that share donor information with the U.S. also ban
Copyright 2013 The Associated
Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.