Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


IRS dragging feet in release of interstate migration data

Send a link to a friend  Share

[August 28, 2014]  By Scott Reeder | Illinois News Service
 
 SPRINGFIELD — The Internal Revenue Service is dragging its feet releasing data on migration of people — and their income — between states.

In the past, it has taken one to two years for the IRS to prepare and release migration information, but now it will take three years, said J. Scott Moody, who heads State Budget Solutions, a national group dedicated to promoting fiscal responsibility in the state governments.

Shutterstock photo
Shutterstock photo
WHO’S MOVING?: The IRS isn’t being very forthcoming with data showing migration between states.
“The data indicates that year after year, people are moving from high-tax ‘blue’ states like Illinois to low-tax ‘red’ states,” Moody, said.

There is no legitimate reason this data would be withheld, he said.

“The (compiling of) IRS migration data was actually cancelled a few years ago, but it was reinstated thanks to a lot of political pressure from Congress. But since that reinstatement they have taken a quite a long time – and that is a disservice to taxpayers,” Moody said.



For example, according to a memo written by Ruth Schwartz of the IRS Statistics of Income Division, migration information for 2012 will not be available until late 2015 – three years after the returns have been filed.

“Please note that this time frame is tentative. We are limited by current project workloads and staffing resources,” she added.

St. Louis researcher Travis Brown wrote the book “How Money Walks” based on IRS migration data.

“This is extremely important information. We are talking about trillions of dollars moving across the country,” he said. “This information is available because of the urging of Congress. There is absolutely no good reason for why the IRS can’t provide this information.”

But Brown stopped short of ascribing political motivations to the IRS’ pokiness.

[to top of second column]

“It’s certainly an elegant theory that politics is behind this. But generally I believe the simplest explanation: the bureaucrats don’t value transparency,” he said. “The IRS views its job as collecting revenue, not sharing information with the public.”

Brown added that excuses such as “staffing shortages” ring hollow to him.

“We have heard a lot of excuses from the IRS. But the bottom line is they are providing lots of other data. There is no reason why they can’t provide this,” Brown said. “How else would we know where 134 million Americans choose to live and where they choose to move to?”

Moody said migration information is important for state lawmakers to use when shaping policy to ensure growth and encourage a healthy state business climate.

Elected officials on the state and local level can review the migration data and determine where people are moving.

For example, Brown’s research found that between 1992 and 2002 Illinois lost $31.27 billion in annual adjusted gross taxpayer income. The top states Illinois lost taxpayer income to were Florida, Arizona, California, Texas and Wisconsin.

“Often times, elected officials are oblivious to where people are moving,” Brown said. “A Chicago person may see a U-Haul in their neighborhood and think it is heading to Aurora when in reality it is going to Fort Myers, Fla., or Phoenix. Lawmakers can review the information, see where people are moving and find out why and cite the data for making policy changes such as lowering taxes.”

The IRS migration data for previous years can be viewed at: http://www.howmoneywalks.com/irs-tax-migration/

[This article courtesy of Watchdog.]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

< Recent commentaries

Back to top