Sponsored by: Investment Center

Something new in your business?  Click here to submit your business press release

Chamber Corner | Main Street News | Job Hunt | Classifieds | Calendar | Illinois Lottery 

Fed's Lacker says tough to see pause in tapering ahead

Send a link to a friend 

[February 05, 2014]  By Krista Hughes

WINCHESTER, Virginia (Reuters)  The U.S. Federal Reserve will probably keep reducing monthly asset purchases at its current pace and it would be hard to make the case for a pause in the tapering process, a senior Fed official said on Tuesday.

Richmond Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Lacker said U.S. stocks had performed well looking at the last year and recent moves likely reflected a downward adjustment in expectations for growth.

Importantly, moves in financial markets did not seem to have affected the outlook for jobs, a key benchmark for future policy at the U.S. central bank, which has started to trim back its policy stimulus by reducing asset purchases by $10 billion at each of its last two policy meetings.

"I think the hurdle ought to remain pretty high for pausing in tapering," Lacker, who has long opposed the aggressive stimulus, told reporters.

"We linked the asset purchase programs to significant improvement in the outlook for labor market conditions, that has definitely occurred, and I don't see financial market developments as having affected the outlook for labor market conditions materially at this point."

He declined to comment on what kind of scenario might pass the hurdle.

The Fed trimmed its monthly asset-purchase program to $65 billion per month last week and policymakers will not meet again until March. Lacker said he expected the current pace of a $10 billion reduction every meeting to continue and played down the chance of a bigger move.

Weak U.S. data pushed the benchmark S&P 500 index into its worst single-day drop in seven months on Monday and MSCI's benchmark index for emerging market stocks <.MSCIEF> hit its lowest level since August.

Lacker, who is among the more hawkish of the Fed's 17 current policymakers, said markets might be coming in line with his view that economic growth would slow this year to "a little above" 2 percent, citing muted spending by consumers and businesses and modest expected labor productivity.

"I think maybe now (they are) revising down their sense of how much momentum the second half is really providing us," he said in response to a question.

"I wouldn't call it 'turmoil' yet. We've still got a great stock market looking back over the last year."

Lacker's growth forecast is on the low end of the range of predictions, of between 2.2 percent and 3.3 percent GDP growth, made in December by Fed policymakers. New forecasts are also due in March.

[to top of second column]


In a speech at Shenandoah University, Lacker also predicted, as most Fed officials have, that today's low inflation will rise to the Fed's 2-percent goal over the next year or two.

The central bank has said it will keep benchmark interest rates near zero well past the time unemployment falls below 6.5 percent, especially if inflation remains below target.

The jobless rate has now fallen to 6.7 percent and Lacker said the so-called forward guidance would have to be rejigged as and when that threshold was reached.

"We will have to reformulate it and provide some qualitative way of providing an assessment of what time horizon we think is most likely," said Lacker, who does not vote on monetary policy this year.

"I'd point out that the SEP (summary of economic projections) provides a rich portrayal of the array of views within the committee and even if we said nothing the SEP would be pretty informative."

Earlier, he told the audience there were various factors at play determining the timing of the first rate rise, noting he personally saw a move in early 2015.

"If we do see growth pick up to 3 percent, 2-3/4 percent on a sustained basis over three or four quarters, I think that would be a clear sign that increasing rates would be needed," he said, although an earlier, pre-emptive hike might also be appropriate.

"I think you are likely to hear communication from the Federal Reserve before it happens indicating that it's likely to happen soon, so I doubt we are going to surprise you," Lacker said.

(Reporting by Krista Hughes; writing by Krista Hughes and Jonathan Spicer; editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

[ 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]

Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Recent articles

Back to top