They told the court they needed access to Kenyatta's financial
records, which they said might show that he had indirectly paid
large sums of money to perpetrators of a wave of post-election
violence that swept Kenya six years ago.
Kenyatta is charged with crimes against humanity related to the
violence in early 2008 when 1,200 died and thousands were driven
from their homes. He denies the charges.
"It is nearly two years since we asked for this material," said
prosecution lawyer Ben Gumpert.
"Of all the leads available to us, we have exhausted all reasonable
prospects. But we are under a duty to pursue our investigations...
The stones that remain to be turned are getting less and less
promising," Gumpert said, explaining why access to Kenyatta's
financial records could be crucial.
"We characterize the position of the government of Kenya as one of
pure obstructionism," he said.
Prosecutors are asking judges to rule that Kenya is not meeting its
obligations to the court and to adjourn the trial until it turns
over further material in a case which has driven a wedge between
African countries and the ICC's Western backers.
Kenyatta's lawyers, who want judges to dismiss the case, said the
prosecution was attempting to abandon its case while pinning the
blame for its failure on the Kenyan government.
The trial is important to the ICC, which has secured only one
conviction and suffered a string of collapsed cases since it was set
up 11 years ago. Kenya says the court risks destabilizing east
Africa if it presses on with the charges.
"CLIMATE OF FEAR"
Western countries, while keen to back the ICC, are also anxious to
maintain relations with Kenya, seen as a key ally in the battle
against militant Islamism in neighboring Somalia.
ICC prosecutors say Kenyatta orchestrated the clashes, but their
case has been weakened by the withdrawal of a string of witnesses
since charges were first brought four years ago.
Presiding judge Kuniko Ozaki said the court would not rule on
requests by the prosecution or the defense on Wednesday.
[to top of second column]
The trial was postponed for a fourth time last month when
prosecutors said another witness had withdrawn, and requested more
time to gather evidence. They say their witnesses have been
blackmailed or intimidated into withdrawing.
In a January 31 court filing, prosecutors said a "climate of fear"
had weakened their case and that judges should rule that Kenya was
in breach of its obligation to help investigators.
But a lawyer for Kenyatta said the Kenyan government had been right
to withhold the financial records since they had been requested
directly by prosecutors, not by the court as a whole.
"The nature of the (January 31) filing is that this is an attempt to
stop the case without admitting who has failed here," said defense
lawyer Stephen Kay. "It is a blame-shifting exercise onto the
government of Kenya."
The case grew more controversial throughout Africa after Kenyatta,
the son of his country's founder, won a presidential election last
year on a joint ticket with William Ruto, his deputy, who is on
trial on similar but separate charges.
Following his victory, Kenyatta used his position as leader of East
Africa's economic powerhouse to rally African Union allies in a
diplomatic push to have the United Nations Security Council defer
the case against him.
Although that was unsuccessful, the ICC's 122 member states did
agree to change court rules to make it easier for heads of state
facing charges to give evidence by video link.
Prosecutors say authorities have obstructed attempts to interview
police officers, and have given investigators only limited access to
phone records crucial to building their case.
(Editing by Alistair Lyon)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.