While they may choose to wait for updated medium-term economic
forecasts in March before deciding whether to act, the drop in
inflation to just 0.7 percent last month highlights the immediacy of
the deflation risk facing the 18-country bloc.
After the ECB's January policy meeting, President Mario Draghi set
out two scenarios that could trigger fresh policy action: a
deterioration in the medium-term inflation outlook and an
"unwarranted" tightening of short-term money markets.
ECB policymakers have discussed — in theory — a number of policy
measures they could deploy to deal with either of these scenarios.
Each comes with its own merits and drawbacks.
Following is a description of some of the main options and their
respective pros and cons.
INTEREST RATE CUT
With the ECB's main interest rate already at just 0.25 percent, the
central bank is running out of room to lower official borrowing
costs. Analysts polled by Reuters last month did not expect the ECB
to cut rates within a forecast horizon extending to June 2015.
[ID:nL5N0L32MW] Should the ECB opt to lower rates, it would probably
go with a smaller cut than the 25-basis-point increment it has
always used — to 0.1 percent, for example. Such a step would send a
signal that the ECB is ready to act to meet its inflation target,
but would have only a muted impact on the economy.
The ECB's other key interest rate, the deposit rate it pays banks
leaving their money with it overnight, now stands at zero. Lowering
this into negative territory would see it effectively charge banks
to hold their money securely. This would give banks a greater
incentive to lend, rather than parking funds at the central bank.
The ECB says it is technically ready to make this move. When Denmark
introduced negative deposit rates in 2012, however, banks simply
increased their loan rates to make up for having to pay the central
bank to hold their money.
The ECB has discussed the possibility of suspending operations to
soak up money it spent buying sovereign bonds during the euro zone's
debt crisis under its now-terminated Securities Markets Programme.
[ID:nL5N0L92MG] Ending the so-called "sterilization" operations
would inject about 175 billion euros ($236.43 billion) of liquidity
into the financial system, which would help ease strains in euro
zone money markets.
One argument against suspending the sterilization operations would
be to avoid raising questions about ECB policy ahead of a ruling by
the German Constitutional Court on the central bank's new
The court is considering whether the ECB's plans to buy "unlimited"
amounts of bonds from stricken euro zone states, announced in 2012
at the height of the crisis, is really a vehicle for funding member
states through the back door. That could violate German law.
Purchases made under the yet-to-be-used bond plan are also meant to
be sterilized to stop them fuelling inflation.
[to top of second column]
The ECB funneled over 1 trillion euros into the financial system in
late 2011 and early 2012 with twin three-year long-term refinancing
operations (LTROs) at low interest rates. The move provided banks
with ample liquidity, giving them more certainty about their funding
situation and taking tension out of money markets. But banks have
been repaying big chunks of the loans early so there is no guarantee
they would jump again at a repeat offer, especially as they are
tidying up their books ahead of a health check of the banking sector
by the ECB.
Quantitative easing (QE) — effectively, printing money — would be a
way to flood the economy with funds. By buying government bonds on
the secondary market, the ECB could bring down market interest rates
and ease money market tensions. The increase in the money supply
would, in theory, also push up prices and stave off the deflationary
threat. Although the ploy has been used by the U.S. Federal Reserve,
the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England, many ECB policymakers
have deep reservations about making this move, from which they fear
it would be difficult to exit. Another concern is that the merits of
QE are unclear: in the United States, a quicker clean-up of the
banking sector than in Europe may have been the decisive factor in
pepping up the economy, not QE.
SHARPER FORWARD GUIDANCE
The ECB has vowed to keep its key interest rates "at present or
lower levels for an extended period of time". But how long is an
'extended period'? To help anchor inflation expectations, the ECB
could sharpen its language. The Fed did this by tying its guidance
to developments in the U.S. labor market, but a problem for the ECB
may be that its mandate is to focus on price stability, not the
broader economy. The Bank of England's recent experience may also
not inspire the ECB to refine its message. Its forward guidance was
rendered virtually obsolete last month when Britain's jobless rate
fell close to the 7.0 percent level the BoE set in August as a
threshold for considering higher interest rates, confident it would
take years to get there.
(Writing by Paul Carrel; editing by
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.