Halting work on the $5.25 billion project to widen and deepen the
canal would be a setback for companies eager to use the century-old
waterway to ship liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the U.S.
Gulf coast to Asian markets.
While the two sides are at odds over who should pay for $1.6 billion
in cost overruns, both have agreed to put up at least $100 million
each to keep the project running.
However, building consortium Grupo Unidos por el Canal (GUPC), led
by Spanish construction company Sacyr <SCYR.MC>, said in a statement
it had asked the canal administrator for a $400 million advance.
Earlier, the Panama Canal Authority proposed a $283 million joint
financing package, which was less attractive for the building
companies because it requires them to put up fresh cash while the
authority would simply advance funds it would have paid anyway.
Under that plan, the canal authority and the consortium would each
put up $100 million, while the canal would give the group more time
to repay $83 million that was advanced to them.
It is also conditional on the consortium withdrawing a threat to
stop work on January 20 and to process its claim for $1.6 billion in
cost overruns separately through agreed arbitration panels.
The canal authority had no immediate comment on the consortium's
counter-offer, which also calls on the canal authority to extend a
moratorium on the repayment of a $784 million cash advance already
paid out until arbitration ends.
"The Panama Canal can't have this work stopped," the canal
authority's head, Jorge Quijano, told reporters in Panama City
earlier on Tuesday. "And we have to do everything necessary to
continue with the project."
Work on the expansion, which will create a new lane of traffic along
the canal and double the waterway's capacity, began in 2007, and the
project is 72 percent complete, according to the Panama Canal
The consortium, which also includes Italy's Salini Impregilo <SALI.MI>,
Belgium's Jan De Nul and Panama's Constructora Urbana, said last
week it had faced the added costs due to unforeseen setbacks in the
$3.2 billion project to build a third set of locks for the canal.
It said geological studies carried out by the Panama Canal Authority
were flawed. The authority has not yet responded.
[to top of second column]
IN THE BALANCE
If the parties fail to reach an agreement, the project could
potentially be offered up to other companies.
Bechtel, a U.S. engineering company which lost out in the original
bidding process, declined to comment when asked if it was ready to
step into the project if the opportunity arose.
A source close to the consortium speculated that Bechtel was waiting
to step in, but said the GUPC considers it has a very strong
bargaining position given contractual clauses.
On Monday, Spain's ambassador to Panama said his country's
government will not provide any financing.
Sacyr won the canal contract in 2009 with an offer considerably
below the main rival bids and also below the $3.48 billion reference
set by the canal authority. U.S. diplomatic cables published by
Wikileaks show President Ricardo Martinelli's government was worried
about progress before six months had passed.
Sacyr, whose debts at end-September were three times its market
capitalization, made 55 percent of revenue outside Spain in the
first nine months of 2013. Panama contributed 25 percent of its 1.3
billion euros ($1.78 billion) in international sales, according to
its 2013 nine-month earnings statement.
Sacyr shares closed up 4.7 percent on Tuesday, extending a rebound
on heavy volume of 17.8 million shares after falling sharply when
the row flared in early January.
(Additional reporting by David Adams in
Miami, Fiona Ortiz in Madrid and Gabriel Stargardter, Dave Graham
and Julia Symmes Cobb in Mexico City and Danilo Masoni in Milan;
writing by Simon Gardner; editing by Ken Wills, Stephen Powell,
David Gregorio and Bernard Orr)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.