LeBlanc, 46, who spent 10 years playing the dim-witted but
lovable Joey Tribbiani on "Friends," has found a new lease of
life on television playing the reckless and rude character of
Matt LeBlanc on Showtime's "Episodes," a role that has already
won him a Golden Globe award.
"Episodes," now in its third season, premieres on Sunday, and
will see its leading characters once again tackle the
dysfunctional personalities running the complex and convoluted
back end of Hollywood's television industry as they try to make
a hit television show.
Sitting at his publicist's office in Beverly Hills, a jovial
LeBlanc talked to Reuters about life after "Friends" and
blurring the lines between fiction and reality on "Episodes."
Q: What do you enjoy the most about playing a version of
yourself in "Episodes"?
A: It's actually quite fun to play basically the public's
perception of the celebrity. So it's not accurately me at all.
Sometimes it's right on the money, and sometimes it's way off
base. I've really stuck to my guns about not differentiating
which is which, because a lot of people ask me how similar am I
to Matt LeBlanc in the show, and I think that, to me, is
relevant. My job is to make you, the audience, believe I am Joey
Tribbiani or I am Matt LeBlanc, that's an actor's job, to have
this seamless interpretation of a character.
Q: Were there any 'no-go' areas of you life that you
didn't want drawn in?
A: Yes. In terms of my family, I am divorced and have a
daughter and have two step kids. In the show, I'm divorced and
have two sons. And that was enough to not have it mirror my life
too much in that area. Aside from that, the marching orders have
always been for all of us that I don't mind being the brunt of
the joke if it's a great joke. If it's worth it, I'm game. If
it's just low-hanging fruit (then no).
Q: Have you drawn inspiration from any real celebrities
in Hollywood for the character of Matt LeBlanc in "Episodes"?
A: Yes, there's probably a dash of Charlie Sheen in
there, if you're trying to think of some of the zaniest behavior
you've heard of. What we've done with Matt is pushed the
envelope. I remember seeing on the front page of the Calendar
section of the Sunday Los Angeles Times when we were on
"Friends" that my salary was published, how much we were making.
And I was like, 'Wow, that's embarrassing, look at that number.'
There's a gamut of emotions. People know how much money I made,
it's weird, certain things are nobody's business.
So when we were developing the guidelines of who this guy Matt
is for "Episodes," I said, "What about if everybody assumes I'm
rich? Let's make me in the show way richer than I really am, and
I think it'll be fun to have this guy where money is no object,"
He can be as generous as he wants or as frivolous as he wants,
just go crazy with that aspect of it because that's what people
think when they think of the six of us from "Friends" because of
the money that was reported. Which was reported low by the way
(laughs). It's a little bit more. It's actually a lot more!
[to top of second column]
Q: We still see a lot of camaraderie between
the "Friends" cast, often doing guest spots on each other's
projects. Will you reunite with any of them in the future of
A: I don't know. It'll always be great to work with them.
It'd be a different kind of guest spot for them to do this because
they would have to play themselves, a version of themselves that
they're comfortable with.
Q: After "Friends," you were the lead in its spin-off "Joey,"
that was canceled. What did you take from that?
A: We were supposed to fill the shoes of "Friends," same time
slot, same network ... It's almost insurmountable odds. It's really
quite a bit of pressure. And it could never replace ("Friends"), it
was never shown as a new show, it was perceived as this watered-down
continuation of "Friends." And it wasn't the same so it was never
going to stand up. In that sense, it never stood a chance.
Q: After "Friends" and "Joey," you stepped away for a few
years. What were you able to reflect on during your time away?
A: The things I did think about in terms of my career were
the most recent thing, the mistakes I felt that had been made on
"Joey," and things I saw, mistakes being made right in front of me
and I could have put my foot down and didn't. I think I learned from
that, I'm not the smartest guy in the room, but I've been around for
a while now and I do have an opinion that I believe in, and from
that point on, I will voice my opinions and interject.
... From 1994 to 2006, I had my nose to the
grindstone, took a trip here and there, but I was such a slave to
work and when that all ended, I was like, 'Wow, my life hasn't
really advanced that much.' There was a marriage that happened
during that time that I didn't maybe pay enough attention to, or I
didn't have my priorities sorted as they should have been. Live and
learn, I guess.
Q: It must have been good to get that perspective?
A: Stepping back and looking on it, I think what I came away
with was that work is not the most important part of life. At 46.
Nice. Maybe I am Joey!
(Reporting by Piya Sinha-Roy; editing by
Patricia Reaney and Andrew Hay)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.