not seen meeting U.S. deadline on security deal
Send a link to a friend
[January 10, 2014]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — U.S. efforts
to persuade Afghan President Hamid Karzai to sign a long-term security
agreement according to Washington's timetable will likely fail, the lead
American negotiator has warned the Obama administration, the Washington
Post reported on Thursday.
In a classified cable that the Post said was transmitted in recent
days, U.S. Ambassador James Cunningham wrote that he did not think
Karzai would agree to sign the agreement before Afghanistan's
presidential election in April, the newspaper said, citing U.S.
officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The United States wants the Afghanistan government to sign the
agreement in matter of weeks if a contingent of U.S. troops is to
remain there after 2014, the White House said on Monday.
Without a deal, the United States could pull out all troops, the
"zero option," leaving Afghan forces to battle the Taliban on their
Karzai has called that an empty threat and suggested any security
deal could wait until after the April elections.
The United States has 46,000 troops in Afghanistan, but that figure
is set to fall to 34,000 by early 2014.
In a another move likely to strain U.S.-Afghan ties, a spokesman for
Karzai said on Thursday that Afghanistan had enough evidence to try
only 16 of 88 prisoners the United States considers a threat to
security and plans to free the remaining detainees.
[to top of second column]
Washington strongly opposes their release because it says the
prisoners being held in Afghanistan have been involved in the
wounding or killing of U.S. and coalition troops.
(Reporting by Peter Cooney; editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.