Whether middle
class or wealthy, or any political persuasion offered in America, we
should look at the trends in America during this current time and
answer an important question. I guess the thing I don't understand
is how does it profit any politician, or the people who surround
them, the unions and millions of dependent people who keep voting
for dependency if the country becomes so shattered by bankruptcy and
continued debt? I understand that more federal agencies will be
created and more bureaucracy will be needed to keep things going for
awhile. But there is always a day of reckoning when the debt becomes
due.
But what is the use of having any power over a country that is
broken, with a destroyed military, fractured social system and very
few rich to foot the bill? I understand the theory and the
implementation that started in the Depression of the 1930s,
but eventually the rich will be poor. All the money available will
be redistributed and will run out. Stronger nations, China, India,
Middle East will be able to overtake the country with little or no
force. If there are 50 or 60 percent dependent on some facet of
government welfare or a substantial variety of government programs,
it is for sure they will not fight to hold on to anything; they will
not know how nor will they have the will to do so. The richest of
the rich will have moved themselves and their operations out to
another country long before the collapse, so what will the extreme
left gain by destroying the American way of life, unless it is just
the sheer satisfaction of destroying it because they take pleasure
in doing so.
My mother used to say about some people who tended to destroy
themselves in the process of trying to hurt others was like "cutting
off your nose to spite your face." It is like feeling sorry for the
Menendez brothers because they are orphans.
[to top of second column] |
If a liberal person aligns himself with the current values of
liberalism, he would say he wanted higher taxes, bigger government,
more public officials and employees, more agencies with millions
more public employees, larger, stronger unions, punishment for
people who have money and social changes paid for by the government.
Now if that liberal person was the one who had the money for the
government to tax, take and redistribute, and the same liberal
"wealthy" person looked at the current debt, along with a long
recession and unemployment as it is currently, I would hope that he
would wonder what was going to happen when his money was gone. As
well as wonder about the state of his life when the unions have shut
down his business, all the Social Security is gone, Medicare is gone
and the Chinese military is marching over the hill.
He might say, "What was in it for me?" What was in it for any of us,
except failure. It matters not if we are rich or middle class, when
a democratic form of government begins to feed upon itself and
demand from those who have worked and produced the fruits of their
production, and through some governmental confiscatory manner robs
them of their means to give to others, the days of that democratic
nation are numbered.
Perhaps instead of blaming the rich, or the Republicans for that
matter, why don't we look at these problems in a logical, rational
way? Is there any rational, prudent person who believes that we
can continue spending money we don't have and not have dire
consequences? Is there anyone who really believes that we can
continue to tax to a point where it makes no sense to produce
anything? Is there anyone who rationally believes we can continue to
borrow money from China and others to continue deficit spending all
the way to the destruction of the U.S. dollar on the world market? Is
there anyone who rationally believes we can continue to import
70 percent of our energy from other countries as we embargo the
development of our own resources that would make us energy-independent? A reasonably prudent person would say this is
outlandish. Blasting the wealthy may feel good to some for now, but
someday they will be gone. To whom, then, will we turn to blast?
[By JIM KILLEBREW]
Click here to respond to the editor about this
article. |