Privately-held Intellectual Ventures sued Motorola in 2011, claiming
the mobile phone maker infringed patents covering a variety of
smartphone-related technologies, including Google Play. Motorola has
denied the allegations and will now go to trial over three of those
Barring any last-minute settlements, jury selection is scheduled to
begin on Tuesday at a federal court in Wilmington, Delaware.
The trial takes place amid an unfolding debate in Congress over
patent reform, in which Intellectual Ventures and Google are on
opposite sides. Google is backing attempts to curb software patents
and make it easier to fight lawsuits, while IV has warned that
Congress should not act too rashly to weaken patent owners' rights.
IV and other patent aggregators have faced criticism from some in
the technology industry, who argue that patent litigation and
royalty payments have become a burdensome tax on innovation. They
say firms like IV, which do not primarily make products, are
exploiting the patent system.
But IV argues that unlike some of the firms denounced as "patent
trolls," it invests only in quality intellectual property and does
not file frivolous lawsuits. IV also says it helps inventors get
paid for their innovations while helping tech companies protect and
manage their intellectual property.
Should the Delaware jury rule against Motorola and uphold IV's
patents, it could bolster the firm's argument that it does not buy
frivolous patents, said Shubha Ghosh, a University of Wisconsin Law
Yet a win for Motorola could be held up as evidence that the U.S.
government issues too many dubious patents. And even if IV prevails,
Google could still argue that patent litigation before a jury of
non-expert citizens is akin to a lottery, said Ghosh, who supports
"Just because you have a winning ticket doesn't mean it's not still
a lottery," he said.
IV and Google both declined to comment on the upcoming trial.
Since its founding in 2000, IV has raised about $6 billion (3.6
billion pounds) from investors and has bought tens of thousands of
intellectual property assets from a variety of sources. Google was
an investor in IV's first patent acquisition fund, but did not join
IV filed a barrage of lawsuits in 2010 against companies in various
sectors, and most defendants have since settled.
Two of the patents in the upcoming Motorola trial cover inventions
by Richard Reisman, U.S. government records show. Through his
company, Teleshuttle, Reisman has developed several patent
portfolios for various technologies, including an online update
service, according to the Teleshuttle website.
IV claims that the two Reisman patents cover several of Motorola's
older-generation cellphones that have Google Play, a platform for
Android smartphone apps. Motorola argues that IV's patents should
never have been issued because the inventions were known in the
[to top of second column]
Reisman did not respond to requests for comment.
One of the patents in play against Motorola has been in a courtroom
before. Teleshuttle and a British partner, BTG, sued Microsoft and
Apple in 2004 using one of the same patents now in play against
In 2006, Teleshuttle and BTG sold their patent rights to
Delaware-based Twintech EU LLC for $35 million up front, plus a
percentage of future licensing fees, according to BTG's website. At
the same time as the sale, BTG and Teleshuttle abruptly withdrew
their cases against Apple and Microsoft.
Microsoft and Apple were both early investors in Intellectual
Ventures. IV often uses subsidiary companies to buy patents, and
then transfer them at a later date to related corporate entities,
though public records do not indicate whether IV had an ownership
interest in Twintech.
IV took title on the patents from Twintech in September 2011 and
sued Motorola a month later, U.S. records show. In a 2011 blog post,
Reisman wrote that his deal with IV provided resources "to let me
focus on my work as an inventor."
Microsoft declined to comment while Apple did not respond to a
request for comment.
Another patent being asserted against Motorola was originally issued
to Rajendra Kumar in 2006. Kumar's company, Khyber Technologies,
transferred it to Balustare Processing NY LLC in July 2011, which
passed it over to IV about a month later, patent records show.
Khyber Technologies was founded in 1991 with the goal of creating
the next generation of handheld computing products, according to its
website. The patent that IV obtained from Khyber covers detachable
handset technology, which IV claims Motorola used in its defunct
Kumar declined to comment on the IV lawsuit.
If IV wins, damages will be decided at a later proceeding. The trial
is expected to last about ten days.
The case in U.S. District Court, District of Delaware is
Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II, 11-908.
(Reporting by Dan Levine; editing by
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.