A victory would make the Spanish left-hander the third man to win
all four grand slam titles twice, joining Australians Rod Laver and
Roy Emerson, and also draw him level with Pete Sampras on 14 career
It would also leave him three behind Wawrinka's compatriot Roger
Federer, who Nadal beat in the semi-finals, and would no doubt
generate another round of debate as to who can justifiably be called
the greatest player of all time.
"Is there one greatest player of all time?" Sampras replied when
asked by reporters if Nadal or Federer could be labeled with that
"I believe when you look at the history of the game, each decade has
"Certainly Roger has been the best player for the last 10 years.
Rafa is up there with him. (Novak) Djokovic is pushing. So it's
really hard to say.
"Rafa has won all the majors, he's been number one. You could argue
that he's well up there. If he plays the next four or five years, he
could have 17, 18 majors.
"Let's just appreciate what we're watching. It's hard to compare the
numbers and the eras where we all did our thing."
Both sides have a strong case in the Nadal v Federer debate.
Fans of the Swiss suggest Nadal's record is skewed by his claycourt
dominance over the years, while the Spaniard's supporters point to
his 23-10 head-to-head record over Federer.
If Nadal does beat Wawrinka, however, it is inevitable the question
will be asked whether he can achieve what no man has done since
Laver in 1969 and win a calendar grand slam.
Few would bet against him winning his ninth French Open title in
early June. He has lost just one match — to Robin Soderling in the
fourth round in 2009 — at the claycourt grand slam since 2005.
And the manner in which he accounted for 17-times grand slam winner
Federer, who had looked back to his fluid best at Melbourne Park
after a dismal 2013, suggests he will be hard to beat at Wimbledon
and the U.S. Open.
Nadal, who has played the tournament with strapping across his left
hand due to a painful blister, is only focused on the challenge
posed by the 28-year-old Wawrinka.
"He's playing better than ever ... he's a player that is ready to
win against everybody," Nadal said.
"If I don't play my best tennis ... I don't have (a) chance
to beat him."
[to top of second column]
Nadal holds a 12-0 career record over Wawrinka but he has every
reason to be concerned about the challenge from the quietly spoken
Swiss, who has found a new level of consistency and seems confident
he can reach the upper echelon of the men's game.
He pushed Djokovic to five-sets in both the Australian and U.S. Open
last year — the latter was in his first grand slam semi-final — which capped off a year in which scored eight wins against top-10
opponents, the third-best total on the ATP Tour.
Wawrinka started 2014 by winning his fifth career title at Chennai
and then beat world number two Djokovic, again in five sets, in the
quarter-finals at Melbourne Park, ending a 14-match losing streak to
He handily beat seventh Tomas Berdych in the semi-finals.
"I saw him play against Novak. I saw him play against Berdych. He's
playing great," Nadal said.
"He's serving unbelievable. He's hitting the ball very strong from
"If I am not able to play my best, I think I will not have chances
because he's coming to this match with a lot of victories and
Wawrinka said his past record against Nadal had not entered his
thoughts and he was heading into his first grand slam final with a
lot of confidence.
"The record is not what I'm looking (at). That's what is it against
Rafa (and) I don't care about having lost 14 times.
"But I (had) some good match last year against him, close ones ...
(and) I have more confidence in myself.
"I know that when I go on court I can beat almost everybody, even in
the big stage."
(Writing by Greg Stutchbury in Wellington;
editing by Peter
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.