The ignition switch problems led to the recall of 1.6 million
vehicles last month.
GM is a different legal entity than the one that filed the 2009
bankruptcy that shook the U.S. economy. The so-called new GM is not
responsible under the terms of its bankruptcy exit for legal claims
relating to incidents that took place before July 2009. Those claims
must be brought against what remains of the "old" or pre-bankruptcy
But the proposed class action, filed in federal court in California,
said plaintiffs should be allowed to sue over the pre-bankruptcy
actions, "because of the active concealment by Old GM and GM."
The lawsuit also said that GM was responsible for reporting to the
federal government any safety-related problems for cars made before
A spokesman for the automaker declined to comment specifically on
the lawsuit, saying the company has apologized for the recall and
that taking care of customers was its top priority.
GM announced the recall in February, despite learning of problems
with the ignition switch in 2001. GM has said that when the ignition
switch was jostled, a key could turn off the car's engine and
disable airbags, sometimes while traveling at high speed.
Wednesday's lawsuit is one of several filed by car owners who claim
the recent recall caused their vehicles to lose value. It appears to
be the first to raise the issue of "successor liability," meaning
that GM could be liable for actions of the company before it emerged
The named plaintiff is Katie McConnell, the owner of a 2007 Saturn
Ion Coupe. The lawsuit is seeking at least $350 million in damages,
according to the lawyer that filed the lawsuit, Steve Berman of
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro.
[to top of second column]
The lawsuit said the "old" GM knew about the ignition problems as
early as 2001, but continued to make and market defective vehicles
until 2007. The new GM continued the deception, the lawsuit alleged.
As a result, the new GM should be liable "for the deceptive and
unfair acts and omissions" of the old GM, the lawsuit said. It also
said the court should waive the statute of limitations for older
claims because of GM's actions.
"While civil in nature, we believe it is a step toward holding G.M.
accountable for its inaction," Berman said in a statement.
The recall over the ignition problem, which has been linked to at
least 12 deaths, has led to government criminal and civil
investigations, an internal probe by GM, and preparations for
hearings by Congress. All ask why GM took so long to address a
problem it has said first came to its attention in 2001.
(Reporting by Jessica Dye; editing by Andrew Hay, Noeleen Walder and
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.