Shakespeare: Richard III Was No Hunchback After All
Send a link to a friend
[May 30, 2014]
By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - William Shakespeare
excoriated Richard III, the last king of England to die in battle more
than 500 years ago, with vibrant verbiage: a "foul bunch-back'd toad,"
"deformed, unfinish'd" and a hunchback so ugly that dogs barked as he
But the bard seems to have missed the mark, scientists said on
Thursday. Their comprehensive analysis of the king's remains,
including a 3-D reconstruction of his spine, confirmed that Richard
was not really a hunchback but instead suffered from scoliosis, a
sideways curvature of the spine.
Scientists spotted the spinal abnormality that looked like scoliosis
when Richard's skeleton - replete with a cleaved skull - was dug up
in the English city of Leicester in 2012 in one of the most
important archaeological finds in recent English history.
Researchers who created a plastic 3-D model of the slain king's
spine based on scans of the bones provided the first complete
account of Richard's condition in a study published in the Lancet
"It's pretty typical idiopathic adolescent-onset scoliosis,"
University of Leicester forensic radiologist Bruno Morgan said.
Richard's spine had a pronounced rightward curve of between 65 and
85 degrees and some twisting that yielded a spiral shape. Such a
person today probably would be offered surgery to address it, the
His right shoulder was higher than his left, and his torso
relatively short compared to his limbs, they added.
"Shakespeare was right that he did have a spinal deformity. He was
wrong with the kind of deformity that he had. He wasn't a
hunchback," University of Cambridge biological anthropologist Piers
"Shakespeare also said that he had a withered arm and a limp. But
looking at the bones, everything is very symmetrical. There are no
signs of a withered arm. And both legs are perfectly well formed.
There is no sign of him having a limp," Mitchell added.
[to top of second column]
Richard was killed at age 32 as he fought to keep his crown at the
Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. His death ended the Plantagenet
dynasty and ushered in the Tudors under Henry VII.
"On the one hand, we want to say, 'This is nowhere near as bad as
Shakespeare said it was.' But we don't want to trivialize somebody
who has got a 70 degree scoliosis because they are going to have
pain and discomfort," Morgan said.
"But there is no doubt that Richard III could put on a suit of armor
and go to battle and fight," Morgan added.
In "Richard III," Shakespeare cast him as a tyrant who murdered two
princes in the Tower of London and died in battle crying out: "A
horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!" Richard's supporters argue
his reputation was tarnished intentionally to cement Tudor rule.
While Shakespeare provides Richard's best known description, it came
more than a century after the king died. "It was colorful, but
Shakespeare was basically writing a play to entertain people,"
(Reporting by Will Dunham; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.