|
Anti-gambling activists campaigned for the referendum,
arguing that casinos would cause harm including problem gambling
and higher crime rates that would outweigh the benefit of any
jobs created in the New England state.
Pro-casino activists noted that neighboring Connecticut was
already home to multiple large casinos, which are patronized by
many Massachusetts gamblers, and that having casinos at home
would boost state coffers.
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has already awarded two
casino licenses, one to MGM Resorts International to open a
casino in Springfield, along the state's border with
Connecticut, and a second to Wynn Resorts Ltd to open a casino
just outside Boston.
The formal award to MGM had been put on hold at the company's
request until the results of Tuesday's referendum were known.
The commission has yet to rule on a third license, to operate a
casino around the Cape Cod beach resort area.
A fourth license, awarded to Penn National Gaming Inc allowed
for a slot machines-only facility on the Rhode Island border.
The planned casinos have already taken a toll on another
longtime Massachusetts institution, the 79-year-old Suffolk
Downs thoroughbred race track, which said last month it had run
its last race after failing in a joint bid with Connecticut's
Mohegan tribe to win the Boston-area license.
(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Peter Cooney)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
|
