|
Civil Court Judge Sabrina Kraus in Manhattan said on Friday
that while she had empathy for Michael Edmonds, the other
tenants were entitled to live in a building that did not smell
of urine or expose them to bio hazards in the common areas.
According to the court, not only did the smell of urine emanate
from Edmonds' apartment, but he also sometimes urinated in
public areas of the building, and was also fired from his job
because of his incontinence.
Edmonds claimed he had suffered from the condition since 2011
and was seeing new doctors and taking medication, but Kraus said
he appeared to be unable to handle the condition on his own.
Furthermore, three cleanings by a city agency had been unable to
get rid of the stench.
Edmonds did not have an attorney. His court-appointed guardian,
Roger Moore, did not return a request for comment. Nor did a
lawyer for the landlord.
Kraus based her decision in part on a 2007 ruling in which the
Appellate Division, First Department, said that a woman who used
a bucket to transport her urine to a communal bathroom 90 feet
from her apartment had created a nuisance warranting her
eviction.
The case is West 141 Street LP v. Michael Edmonds, New York City
Civil Court, No. 80375-13.
For the landlord: Peter Rose of Rose & Rose.
For Edmonds: Pro se.
(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by Ted Botha and Richard
Chang)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
|
