asks judge to reconsider 'gross negligence' ruling
Send a link to a friend
[October 03, 2014]
HOUSTON (Reuters) - BP Plc <BP.L> on
Thursday asked a U.S. court to reconsider a September ruling that found
the company "grossly negligent" for the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico, a finding that boosted its potential liabilities by about $18
The motion filed in Louisiana contends that U.S. District Court
Judge Carl Barbier's ruling was based on evidence he had agreed to
exclude from the ongoing trial. As such, the oil major said, he
should review his decision or give it a new trial.
The evidence in question surrounds expert testimony about how the
Macondo well's casing was weakened and breached, part of a series of
eight alleged errors linked to the blowout.
"BP respectfully requests that the Court eliminate its theory that
this series of acts amounted to gross negligence," the company said
in its motion. "In the alternative, BP would be entitled to a new
The motion is one of many BP has filed to curb fines stemming from
the case. Barbier has rejected most of them.
The company has already taken more than $42 billion in provisions
for the worst offshore spill in U.S. history, which killed 11
workers, and its fines could swell as much as $18 billion when
Barbier assigns damages under the federal Clean Water Act next year.
[to top of second column]
The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in
the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern
District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.
(Reporting by Terry Wade; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.