|
 Known as "dynamic scoring," the approach is about how to estimate
the federal budget impact of tax law changes and it has long been
backed by Republicans but opposed by some Democrats.
In recent remarks to a financial industry group, Representative Paul
Ryan said that if his fellow Republicans can seize control of
Congress in the Nov. 4 elections, they could make dynamic scoring a
more integral part of tax analysis.
"What we want to do is change our measurement so that we can use -
people say it's dynamic scoring - I really prefer to call it
reality-based scoring," said Ryan, favored to become chairman of the
House of Representatives' tax-writing committee in the new Congress
that will convene in January.
"One thing we know for sure, that we're positive about, is the
score-keeping we use is not correct," he said.
Right now, whenever a U.S. lawmaker wants to raise or lower a tax,
the proposal has to be "scored" by the non-partisan staff experts of
Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT).
The JCT score is an estimate of how much a proposal will raise or
lower projected government revenues, usually over 10 years, a
crucial factor due to the large federal deficit.
JCT scores are based on projected alterations in taxpayer behavior
due to tax law changes, but not on changes in the broad economy. For
instance, standard JCT scores hold gross domestic product (GDP)
constant. GDP measures the economy's total output.
Dynamic scoring, as Republicans urge, would include projected
macroeconomic impacts in JCT scores. JCT is already doing some of
this work, under orders from Congress from 2003, in supplemental
materials it issues, but it does not include the results of dynamic
scoring in official scores.
George Yin, a former JCT chief of staff, raised questions such as
whether JCT could do dynamic scoring quickly enough to satisfy
Congress's often tight time frames for action. "There are practical
issues that would have to be resolved," he said.
[to top of second column]
|
Republicans hope incorporating dynamic scoring more centrally into
JCT's work would produce scores that reflect claims that tax cuts
sometimes pay for themselves by stimulating the economy and
generating new government revenues.
Some, but not all, Democrats say such effects are uncertain and that
Republicans want more dynamic scoring so their tax cutting agenda no
longer appears to balloon the deficit, as it does under conventional
scoring.
Further, critics say, making dynamic scoring more central would
degrade JCT's scores because long-range macroeconomic forecasting is
so difficult and imprecise.
To impose changes at JCT, Republicans would have to keep House
control and win control of the Senate, where Orrin Hatch would
likely take over the tax-writing panel. "Senator Hatch has and will
continue to support the use of macroeconomic analysis for major
reforms," said his spokeswoman Julia Lawless.
(Additional reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
