| 
			 Citizens of Elkhart and the surrounding area have voiced their 
			concerns over the placement of the disposal unit. Concerns brought 
			forward included possible toxicity in the fly ash, which may 
			contaminate water and soil. Another major concern was the future of 
			the area after the mine has ceased production. 
 Chairman Doug Thompson read a letter aloud from Guy Fraker, an 
			attorney who could not attend the second part of the hearing, but 
			was present at the first. Fraker’s letter, which was addressed to 
			the Zoning Office, stated that Fraker is opposed to the land being 
			rezoned. Fraker cited the historical significance of the area and 
			the aesthetics of the Elkhart area as reasons for not rezoning the 
			land in question. Fraker’s letter also stated that the issue here is 
			not the safety procedures of the mine, but the suitability of the 
			land for the proposed use. “There is no justification to change to 
			the proposed use,” according to Fraker’s letter.
 
 Don Behle, an attorney representing Elkhart, told the audience that 
			the village of Elkhart has signed a resolution opposing the rezoning 
			of the land. Behle said the primary reason stated in the resolution 
			was the close proximity to the village water supply.
 
 
			
			 
			Behle said the resolution asks for three things. First, the village 
			asks that the ZBA deny the rezoning. Second, the resolution asks 
			that the County Board deny the request. Third, the County Board 
			should have a three-quarters vote to approve the rezoning, should 
			they approve it.
 
 Gillette Ransom, a resident of Elkhart, spoke after Behle. Ransom is 
			one of the founding members of the Elkhart Historical Society, and a 
			former member of the Tourism Board.
 
 Ransom cited the various tourism-centered activities in Elkhart as 
			reasons not to rezone the land. “Elkhart uses tourism as an economic 
			tool,” said Ransom. Ransom said that tourists coming to Elkhart will 
			be turned away by the presence of a coal ash impoundment.
 
 Ransom also said that the Greenways Plan, adopted in 2006, provides 
			a plan for creating scenic, open areas in the county that encourage 
			tourism. “The once scenic by-way from Mount Pulaski to Elkhart is 
			now being framed on the south side by mine waste,” said Ransom. “If 
			the proposed expansion is approved, it could not only allow leeching 
			of toxins into the waterways and ditches, but it will eventually 
			obscure the magnificent view of Elkhart Hill from the east.”
 
 Whitney Pasquesi provided printed studies to the ZBA. The studies 
			were written by three groups: the Physicians of America; the Prairie 
			Rivers Network; and the Sierra Club. Pasquesi did not make 
			presentation on any specific information found in the studies. 
			According to Pasquesi, the studies concerned the environmental and 
			physical health risks of fly ash in Illinois.
 
 Joyce Blumenshine, who is from Peoria, is the chair of the Illinois 
			Sierra Club Mining Issues Committee. Blumenshine said she works with 
			citizens who are concerned over coal mine pollution in Illinois.
 
 Blumenshine said that while the environmental agencies that regulate 
			coal mining do good work, they are underfunded and understaffed. “If 
			anyone thinks the state agencies will come and save you from 
			pollution, I have examples where that has not happened,” said 
			Blumenshine. Blumenshine cited three examples in recent Illinois 
			history in which coal mine pollution was not dealt with in a quick, 
			clean manner.
 
 In addition, Blumenshine questioned the decision to use this land in 
			particular. “It wasn’t chosen because it was the safest, or because 
			the ground is going to protect the watershed. It’s chosen for the 
			profitability and convenience of the mine,” said Blumenshine. Last 
			week, the mine representatives repeatedly stated that the plan 
			centered on this land because it was the most efficient and safe to 
			use, and they already owned the land.
 “Coal ash is toxic because 
			of the metals in it. There was a point in time where science said 
			that certain levels are safe. Now science is saying there is no safe 
			level,” said Blumenshine. Blumenshine also said that there is worry 
			that the toxins will build up and combine over time.
 
			 
			Blumenshine also said that the mine [personnel] has not been 
			diligent in looking for alternate locations.
 
 Phil Gonet, President of the Illinois Coal Association also 
			addressed the ZBA. Gonet said his comments were being made to 
			support the Viper Mine’s efforts.
 
 Gonet said that fly ash was the greatest concern, from what he could 
			tell after last week’s hearing. Gonet reiterated that fly ash is not 
			hazardous. Furthermore, Gonet said that fly ash is not just refuse, 
			but it is also used as filler in constructing highways, bridges, and 
			a wide range of other structures.
 
 “This material is virtually identical in its composition to volcanic 
			ash, with properties that make it ideal for concrete,” said Gonet.
 
			ZBA member Rick Sheley asked why the fly ash is not being sold if it 
			so useful. Gonet said that there is a capacity that has to be kept 
			in mind when selling fly ash, as the customers can only take so much 
			back as part of their contracts. Gonet cited CWLP as an example of 
			one such customer, and the I-72 interchange as an important project 
			that utilized fly ash. Gonet said that coal does contain trace 
			amounts of heavy metals. However, Gonet said that coal and coal ash 
			contained the same metals found in dirt and rocks, and the 
			concentration of the metals is too small to be a hazard, or even to 
			be properly measured. “If coal ash is so harmful as the opponents 
			lead us to believe, then so is the dirt,” said Gonet.  
			
			[to top of second column] | 
 
				 Gonet said that in 1988, coal ash was deemed non-hazardous by 
				the EPA, and further studies continued to support that finding.
				
 Gonet also said that the Viper Mine has been operating 
				successfully for thirty-two years, and they have been exemplary 
				in their monitoring of the current impoundment in that time. 
				Gonet said that anyone can request the mine’s records from IDNR. 
				“The monitoring wells have never detected any excursion from the 
				pond. Never. The Viper Mine has proven to be a responsible 
				steward of this operation,” said Gonet.
 
 Finally, Gonet said that the potential loss of jobs should the 
				mine have to close down early would result in a terrible 
				economic impact, as 300 jobs and those of related contractors 
				would result in the loss of thousands of dollars no longer being 
				spent in the area.
 
 Chairman Doug Thompson asked if Gonet could clarify on 
				reclamation and future monitoring. Gonet said that the land 
				would be drained of water, capped, and vegetated after the mine 
				was closed. Monitoring would also continue to help ensure 
				nothing would leak into the surrounding area. “I believe the 
				company has to monitor that,” said Gonet.
 
 Several employees of the Viper Mine also spoke to the crowd, 
				saying that the Viper Mine is always conscious of safety and the 
				environment, and that not rezoning the land could make it 
				difficult for the mine to retain the 300 jobs currently under 
				its employ.
 
 One of those employees was Rick Hoeffert of Middletown. Hoeffert 
				said he just wanted to let people know that he is one of those 
				jobs that could be lost if the mine has to close down.
 
 Another employee is Mike Oberreiter of Mount Pulaski. Oberreiter 
				said he has several family members and friends that live in 
				Elkhart. “There’s no way I would ask you to support this if I 
				thought this was going to endanger your life,” said Oberreiter. 
				“I can stand here and say that because we have done the same 
				thing for thirty years just across the road.”
 
 Another employee of the mine, Sandra Miller of Taylorville, 
				spoke to the ZBA members as well. Miller said she started 
				working for the mine in 2012 and she began her career working 
				directly with fly ash. “I’m perfectly healthy,” said Miller.
 
 
			
			 
				Miller said the current impoundment has presented no issues in 
				the time it has been used. Miller attributed that to the work 
				ethic of the mine and the regulations that are in place. 
				Furthermore, Miller said that the past examples of mining 
				problems presented by Blumenshine are reason why regulations are 
				so strict. “Those examples are why the regulations change,” said 
				Miller.
 
 “They care about the community and all of us,” said Miller.
 
 Miller said that people she talks to know of Elkhart because of 
				the location of the Viper Mine. “That’s what people know about 
				us. We’re part of your history,” said Miller.
 
 Miller also repeated Oberreiter’s statements, saying that they 
				would not ask for the land to be rezoned if they thought anyone 
				was in danger.
 
 Before the ZBA members began deliberating, Kayla Primm, 
				representing the Viper Mine, made one final statement. Primm 
				reiterated that this facility has been designed in accordance 
				with the most up-to-date regulations, and it would be a refuse 
				disposal area. Ash materials would be blended with other 
				materials as part of the process.
 
 “The ash that we receive is not toxic. We undergo a rigorous 
				permit process overseen by the Department of Natural Resources 
				and the Illinois EPA. They require routine testing of surface 
				water and ground water to provide assurances that the Viper Mine 
				does not impact water quality,” said Primm. Primm reiterated 
				that there are several other agencies that the mine reports to 
				concerning water, air, and ground safety.
 
 In addition, Primm said that coal is listed as a strength under 
				Logan County‘s Economic Master Plan, and said plan encourages 
				multi-county collaboration.
 
 “We strive to be a good neighbor, and we will continue to 
				support these communities. To the board, we say thank you for 
				your time and consideration,” said Primm.
 
 After public comments were closed and final statements were 
				made, ZBA member Rick Sheley made a motion to approve the 
				rezoning and Judy Graff provided a second to the motion. Sheley 
				voted no on the motion, with Graff and Chairman Doug Thompson 
				voting yes. As per ZBA regulations, three votes are needed to 
				approve a motion. As a result of the night’s 2 - 1 vote, the 
				motion to approve failed to pass. The final decision to approve 
				the land re-zoning will be brought to the Logan County Board 
				later this month.
 
			
			 Members of the ZBA present were Doug Thompson, chairman; Rick 
				Sheley, and Judy Graff. The other members of the ZBA decided to 
				abstain from this specific matter for personal reasons. Logan 
				County Zoning Officer Will D’Andrea was also present. 
			[Derek Hurley] |