Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.

 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


http://www.lincolndailynews.com/images/frontpage/killebrew2.jpgInformed voting


By Jim Killebrew

Send a link to a friend  Share

[October 27, 2014]  If you are a person who believes in being informed before you vote so you can vote for a candidate who holds the same position you hold, then consider the issue of abortion the two major political parties hold.

"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay. We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or government to get in the way. We also recognize that health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. We strongly and unequivocally support a woman's decision to have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a child, including caring adoption programs." Source: 2012 Democratic Party Platform , Sep 4, 2012


"Faithful to the "self-evident" truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children. We oppose using public revenues to promote or perform abortion or fund organizations which perform or advocate it and will not fund or subsidize health care which includes abortion coverage. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values and the sanctity of innocent human life. We oppose the non-consensual withholding or withdrawal of care or treatment, including food and water, from people with disabilities, including newborns, as well as the elderly and infirm, just as we oppose active and passive euthanasia and assisted suicide." Source: 2012 Republican Party Platform , Aug 27, 2012

The President and the democrat lawmakers unilaterally passed the Obamacare (Affordable Care Act) without a single republican vote. True to the democrat belief in abortion on demand, and the failure to recognize the sanctity of life, one provision in the "Obamacare" law is to force the Church and other faith-based organizations to furnish components in healthcare that oppose their faith. The President, and DC Democrats support the legality of abortions throughout the entire nine month gestation. It never ceases to amaze me to consistently see the cohabitation of two completely opposed thoughts, ideas, values and practices surviving in the same mind of any individual. How could one hold the value of Christianity and abortion at the same time? I understand the theory of cognitive dissonance where the individual strives for reduction of any one of the dissonant elements. But how could a Democrat/Christian even remotely reduce the element of Christian values and relationship in favor of the practice of abortion becoming dominant in value and practice? There must be a bunch of Democrat/Christians in DC with a terrific headache! Or perhaps that is the reason they have no compunction in forcing faith-based organizations, including the Church, to finance components in healthcare that oppose their faith and value system.

[to top of second column]

Could the United States be accused of engaging in terrorist activities? What if the United States someday legalized the killing of every man, woman, and child in the 74 largest cities in the United States. Would that be carried through history as a terrorist act by the lawmakers who would enact such a law? Even our propensity to be politically correct and re-label an act of terror as a random act of violence would not be able to disguise such a tragic event outside of the reality of a terrorist designation.

And yet, here we are, 41 years after the United States Supreme Court upheld a decision that killing through abortion was legal. The effect: the equivalency of the killing of the entire population of the 74 largest cities in America (over 57 million people).

Isn't it amazing how logical, rational, reasonably prudent, common sense minds of so many Americans could be controlled by thoughts so bizarre and evil as to actually come to believe and even accept as normal a concept that a pregnant woman in our society should have the power of life and death over the human being she carries simply because it has been granted as her choice? As a society, could we be thought of as terrorists for having legally killed over 57 million people through abortion during the last 41 years of our history?

Make no mistake about it, when you vote for a democrat candidate you are voting your approval for the practice of abortion. The Democrat Party has endorsed the full support and funding of abortion on demand. When you vote for a republican candidate your are voting your approval for the sanctity of life. There could be no greater separation of thought regarding this issue.

[By JIM KILLEBREW]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

 

 

< Recent commentaries

Back to top