Thursday, October 30, 2014
 
sponsored by

City of Lincoln continues talks on television agreement between Comcast and Lincoln College
Loss of Public Access portion remains sticking point

Send a link to a friend  Share

[October 30, 2014]  LINCOLN - At last week’s Monday night voting session of the Lincoln City Council, aldermen tabled a vote regarding Lincoln College and an agreement with Comcast that would give the college control over the local cable channel commonly referred to as CITV 5.

After the motion was made, the floor was opened for discussion prior to the vote. At that time, Tom O’Donohue expressed concern about what would become of the Public Access portion of an agreement with Comcast. Lincoln College will take control of Channel 5 and the classification of the channel will change from P-E-G (Public, Education, Government) to E-G only.

As part of the process of giving Channel 5 over to the college, Comcast was asking for a new franchise agreement with the city. In that agreement, the opportunity for an additional channel for public access had been removed. O’Donohue said he didn’t feel the city should approve the agreement between Lincoln College and Comcast until Comcast agreed to put the public access provision back in the franchise agreement.

This week, at the Tuesday night workshop session, John Malone of Lincoln College was present to discuss the situation. Malone leads the Broadcasting, Speech, and Mass Communication programs at the college and is the general manager of the college radio station WLNX. Malone will also be over the cable station once it is up and running.

Malone took the speaker’s chair saying he wanted to define what the college plans to do with Channel 5.

Malone said the college has worked for several years to reach an agreement with Comcast. He noted that throughout its history, “Channel 5 has reflected many different philosophies in its operational paradigm.” He explained the channel was used as an 'on-demand' source for all public uses at the beginning of its existence. In its final years, it was operated as a for-profit channel owned and operated by Tim and Celeste Rogers, who controlled much of the programming.

He said with the end of the relationship between the Rogers’ and Comcast; Comcast became more interested in the college taking over the channel.

Malone said the college was eager to move forward with the education and government channel. He said the upside of the pending agreement was that the college would gain access to, and control of, the existing playback equipment owned by Comcast.

Malone said that the current public demand for public access does not warrant an additional channel for the Lincoln community, but that Lincoln College intends to maintain many of the current public access offerings. He stated specifically that church services would continue to be broadcast as they are now, and the show produced by Lincoln resident Pat O’Neill could continue as well. In addition, he said Lincoln College would seek out new programming that would be considered public access television.

Malone also stated the reason the college was going for an E-G classification instead of a P-E-G was so they could protect the dollars they have invested into this project and retain ownership and control of the equipment. He explained that the public designation means that anyone who takes one short course can come in and operate the equipment. This is a concern for college because they want the equipment handled and cared for properly.

He said the E-G classification does not suggest that the college would deny any local access.

At the end of his comments, O’Donohue asked if the college would put this all in writing. He said he would support an agreement that said the college would allow public access without censorship.

[to top of second column]

The word “censorship” appeared to be a stumbling block. Malone said that public access programming can take many forms. He noted. “There have been incidents in communities, such as East Peoria where I live, where you’ve had the emergence of hate groups demanding time. Once you open that door, that door is open. Is that something we are comfortable with?”

O’Donohue responded, “It is public access. I don’t think you can take the good and not take the bad -- if you believe in freedom of speech. If you believe the purpose of public access is for local people to have a voice in the then emerging cable system, then you believe in public access. I’m not saying that I support any of those things, and I’m not saying they are right. But I don’t think you get to pick and choose, because where do you draw the line? Do you and I have the same values enough to say ‘this is right’ and ‘this is appropriate,’ and, who makes that decision?”

As the discussions continued, Michelle Bauer commented that she didn’t feel the problem with public access should affect the vote on Lincoln College’s agreement with Comcast. She felt that the city should go ahead and vote next week.

O’Donohue disagreed saying that if the city approves the agreement with LC and Comcast, then the city will lose the Public Access television because there is no P (public) classification left for the community.

Melody Anderson, acting as Mayor Pro Tem in the absence of Mayor Keith Snyder said she had to agree with O’Donohue. Bauer said she thought the city was given a vote merely as a courtesy, and Comcast and LC could move forward without the city’s consent. O’Donohue said that in the meetings with Lincoln College and Comcast, the lawyers involved had requested that the city sign off on the agreement.

O’Donohue said he understood LC’s position in wanting to secure its equipment. He repeated his earlier statement that if the college would offer public access without censorship then he would not have a problem with the agreement.

After a few more minutes of discussion, Malone said he thought this could be worked out to the satisfaction of the city. It was also announced that there is a meeting scheduled next week between Comcast, Lincoln College and the city of Lincoln’s new city administrator Clay Johnson.

Johnson said the meeting was on his agenda, but would not take place before next Monday night’s voting session. There is a possibility that the motion will remain tabled next week pending further discussions between the three entities involved in the agreement.

[Nila Smith]

< Top Stories index

Back to top